Normality is not transitive
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., normal subgroup) not satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., transitive subgroup property).
View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions|Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about normal subgroup|Get more facts about transitive subgroup property|
- 1 Statement
- 2 Partial truth
- 3 Corollaries
- 4 Related facts
- 5 Proof
- 6 GAP implementation
- 7 List of counterexamples of small order
- 8 References
- 9 External links
- A group in which every normal subgroup of a normal subgroup is normal is termed a T-group. Note that abelian groups and Dedekind groups are T-groups, and any nilpotent group that is a T-group is also a Dedekind group.
- A group has the property that whenever is normal in , every normal subgroup of is normal in (in other words, transitivity holds with as the middle group) if and only if is a group in which every normal subgroup is characteristic.
- There is no nontrivial group such that whenever is a normal subgroup of a normal subgroup of some group, is normal in that group. In fact, the general example we construct here shows precisely that. Further information: every nontrivial normal subgroup is potentially 2-subnormal-and-not-normal
While normality is not transitive, it is still true that every characteristic subgroup of a normal subgroup is normal. Characteristicity is the left transiter of normality -- it is the weakest property such that every subgroup with property in a normal subgroup is normal. For full proof, refer: Characteristic of normal implies normal, Left transiter of normal is characteristic
While normality is not transitive, every normal subgroup of a transitively normal subgroup is normal. Being transitively normal is the right transiter of being normal. Properties like being a direct factor, being a central subgroup, and being a central factor imply being transitively normal.
The lack of transitivity of normality can also be remedied by defining the notion of subnormal subgroup. Subnormality is the weakest transitive subgroup property implied by normality. More explicitly, a subgroup is subnormal in a group , if we can find a chain of subgroups going up from to , with each subgroup normal in its successor.
A special case of this is the notion of 2-subnormal subgroup, which is a normal subgroup of a normal subgroup. Another special case is the notion of a 3-subnormal subgroup, which is a normal subgroup of a normal subgroup of a normal subgroup.
- Normality is not a finite-relative-intersection-closed subgroup property, because finite-relative-intersection-closed implies transitive.
Making normality transitive
For simplicity, we assume , with the bottom group, the middle group, and the top group.
|Statement||Change in assumption||Change in conclusion|
|Characteristic of normal implies normal||a characteristic subgroup of||is normal in|
|Left transiter of normal is characteristic||in is such that for any possible with normal in , is normal in||is characteristic in|
|Equivalence of definitions of transitively normal subgroup||is normal in ; spelling out conditions for in such that ...||is normal in|
|Central factor implies transitively normal||a central factor of||is normal in|
|Direct factor implies transitively normal||a direct factor of||is normal in|
For particular kinds of groups
For simplicity, we refer below to the three groups as , with the bottom group, the middle group, and the top group, such that is normal in and is normal in , but is not normal in .
|Stronger formulation||Additional restrictions introduced||Additional comments/examples|
|Normality is not transitive for any nontrivially satisfied extension-closed group property||all satisfy a group property closed under taking extensions||could be the property of being a finite -group, any fixed prime ; or solvability, or finiteness|
|Conjunction of normality with any nontrivial finite-direct product-closed property of groups is not transitive||and both satisfy a group property that is closed under finite direct products||Abelian normal subgroup of abelian normal subgroup need not be normal|
|Every nontrivial normal subgroup is potentially 2-subnormal-and-not-normal||We are given and must find with containing|
|Normality is not transitive for any pair of nontrivial quotient groups||We are given nontrivial groups and must ensure|
The extent of lack of transitivity
|Stronger formulation||Meaning of formulation||How "normality is not transitive" is a special case|
|There exist subgroups of arbitrarily large subnormal depth||For any natural number , there exists a group , subgroup , such that the shortest subnormal series for in has length . In other words, the minimum length of a chain from up to , with each subgroup normal in the next, is||Case|
|Descendant not implies subnormal||There exist subgroups for which there is a descending chain from whole group to subgroup, each normal in predecessor, of countable length (so intersection of all members is subgroup) but no finite chain|
|there exist subgroups of arbitrarily large descendant depth|
|Ascendant not implies subnormal||There exist subgroups for which there is an ascending chain from subgroup to whole group, each normal in successor, of countable length (so union of all members is whole group) but no finite chain|
|there exist subgroups of arbitrarily large ascendant depth|
|Normal not implies left-transitively fixed-depth subnormal||We can have a normal subgroup of such that for every , there exists a group containing as -subnormal but is not -subnormal||Case|
|Normal not implies right-transitively fixed-depth subnormal||We can have a normal subgroup of such that for every , there exists a group that is -subnormal in , not in||Case|
Analogues in other algebraic structures
|Statement||Analogy correspondences||Additional comments|
|Ideal property is not transitive for Lie rings||Lie ring group, ideal of a Lie ring normal subgroup|
|Normality is not transitive for field extensions||field extension group (namely, its Galois group), normal field extension normal subgroup in Galois correspondence||A normal field extension of a normal field extension need not be normal. In fact, by the fundamental theorem of Galois theory, this corresponds directly to the fact that a normal subgroup of a normal subgroup need not be normal.|
|Normality is not composition-closed||normal monomorphism normal subgroup||A composite of normal monomorphisms need not be normal.|
(Also see #List of counterexamples of small order).
A natural example is as follows. Take any nontrivial group , and consider the square, (the external direct product of with itself). Now, consider the external semidirect product of this group with the group (the cyclic group of two elements) acting via the exchange automorphism (the automorphism that exchanges the coordinates). Call the big group .
(Note that can be described more compactly as the external wreath product of with the group of order two acting regularly.)
Let be the copies of embedded in as and . We then have:
- is normal in : In fact, is a direct factor of , and is thus normal.
- is normal in : is the base of a semidirect product, and is thus normal. Equivalently, any inner automorphism of is the composite of an inner automorphism in and the exchange automorphism, both of which preserve .
- is not normal in : The exchange automorphism is an inner automorphism of , and it exchanges and -- in particular, it does not preserve . Thus, is not normal in .
Note that both and are copies of , and hence either can be viewed as the Base of a wreath product (?) in .
SIDENOTE: This example is not, in some sense, an extreme example of normality not being transitive. In fact, the property of being the base of a wreath product is transitive, and any base of a wreath product is a 2-subnormal subgroup, which implies that applying this construction iteratively does not yield subgroups of subnormal depth more than two. Even further, base of a wreath product implies right-transitively 2-subnormal, or equivalently, any 2-subnormal subgroup of the base of a wreath product is 2-subnormal in the whole group.
Specific realizations of this generic example
The smallest case of this yields a group of order two, and a group of order eight. In fact, here is the dihedral group of order eight and is a cyclic group of order two, with and being subgroups of order two generated by reflections. Here's how this relates to the usual definition of the dihedral group:
Here, and are both normal in , which is normal in , but neither nor is normal in .
Implementation of the generic example
Here is an implementation of the generic example, with any nontrivial group . Note that you need to define for GAP before executing the commands in this example! Double semicolons have been used to suppress the output here, since the output depends on the choice of (you can use single semicolons instead to display all the outputs).
We first construct the groups using the wreath product command:
gap> G := WreathProduct(H,SymmetricGroup(2));; gap> H1 := Image(Embedding(G,1));; gap> H2 := Image(Embedding(G,2));; gap> K := Group(Union(H1,H2));;
Next, we check that and are subgroups of and is a subgroup of :
gap> IsSubgroup(G,K); true gap> IsSubgroup(K,H1); true gap> IsSubgroup(K,H2); true
Finally, we check that are both normal in and is normal in , but and are not normal in .
gap> IsNormal(G,K); true gap> IsNormal(K,H1); true gap> IsNormal(K,H2); true gap> IsNormal(G,H1); false gap> IsNormal(G,H2); false
The implementation in some special cases
Here is the implementation when is cyclic of order two:
gap> G := WreathProduct(H,SymmetricGroup(2)); <group of size 8 with 2 generators> gap> H1 := Image(Embedding(G,1)); <group with 1 generators> gap> H2 := Image(Embedding(G,2)); <group with 1 generators> gap> K := Group(Union(H1,H2)); <group with 3 generators> gap> IsSubgroup(G,K); true gap> IsSubgroup(K,H1); true gap> IsSubgroup(K,H2); true gap> IsNormal(G,K); true gap> IsNormal(K,H1); true gap> IsNormal(K,H2); true gap> IsNormal(G,H1); false gap> IsNormal(G,H2); false
List of counterexamples of small order
|Big group||Order of big group||Violation of normality being transitive|
|dihedral group:D8||Klein four-subgroup is normal, has normal subgroup of order two that is not normal in the whole group.|
|alternating group:A4||The normal Klein four-group comprising the identity and three double transpositions has a normal subgroup of order two that is not normal in the whole group.|
- Groups and representations by Jonathan Lazare Alperin and Rowen B. Bell, ISBN 0387945261, Page 8, More info Also, Page 6 (first mention), and Page 17 (further explanation)
- Abstract Algebra by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote, 10-digit ISBN 0471433349, 13-digit ISBN 978-0471433347, Page 91, Section 3.2 (More on cosets and Lagrange's theorem), Example (3), (example of the dihedral group)More info Also, Page 135, with justification of the related fact that characteristic of normal implies normal
- An Introduction to Abstract Algebra by Derek J. S. Robinson, ISBN 3110175444More info, Page 66
- A Course in the Theory of Groups by Derek J. S. Robinson, ISBN 0387944613, Page 17, Exercise 1.3.15, More info Also: Page 28, Page 63
- Algebra by Michael Artin, ISBN 0130047635, 13-digit ISBN 978-0130047632, Page 236, Miscellaneous Problems (Chapter 6), Exercise 4, (starred problem)More info
Search for "normality+is+not+transitive" on the World Wide Web:
Scholarly articles: Google Scholar, JSTOR
Books: Google Books, Amazon
This wiki: Internal search, Google site search
Encyclopaedias: Wikipedia (or using Google), Citizendium
Math resource pages:Mathworld, Planetmath, Springer Online Reference Works
Math wikis: Topospaces, Diffgeom, Commalg, Noncommutative
Discussion fora: Mathlinks, Google Groups
The web: Google, Yahoo, Windows Live
Learn more about using the Searchbox OR provide your feedback