# Ascendant not implies subnormal

From Groupprops

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., ascendant subgroup) neednotsatisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., subnormal subgroup)

View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications

Get more facts about ascendant subgroup|Get more facts about subnormal subgroup

EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property ascendant subgroup but not subnormal subgroup|View examples of subgroups satisfying property ascendant subgroup and subnormal subgroup

## Contents

## Statement

An ascendant subgroup of a group need not be a subnormal subgroup.

## Related facts

- Normality is not transitive
- There exist subgroups of arbitrarily large subnormal depth
- Descendant not implies subnormal

## Definitions used

### Ascendant subgroup

`Further information: Ascendant subgroup`

### Subnormal subgroup

`Further information: Subnormal subgroup`

## Proof

### Example of a generalized dihedral group

`Further information: generalized dihedral group of 2-quasicyclic group`

Let be the -quasicyclic group. In other words, is the group of all roots of unity in for all , under multiplication. Consider the semidirect product of with a cyclic group of order two, where acts on by the inverse map. In other words, is the generalized dihedral group corresponding to the abelian group . Then:

- is an ascendant subgroup of : Indeed, consider an ascending chain of subgroups whose member is the subgroup generated by and all the roots of unity. Each member of this ascending chain is normal in its successor, and the union of the ascending chain of subgroups is the whole group.
- is not a subnormal subgroup of : If were -subnormal in for some , would also be -subnormal in every intermediate subgroup. However, the subnormal depth of in the semidirect product of the roots of unity with is , and this grows arbitrarily large. Thus, cannot be -subnormal for some finite . (For more on why the subnormal depth grows arbitrarily large, refer the dihedral groups example in: there exist subgroups of arbitrarily large subnormal depth).