Second isomorphism theorem

From Groupprops

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in group theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this

This article is about an isomorphism theorem in group theory.
View a complete list of isomorphism theorems| Read a survey article about the isomorphism theorems

Name

This result is termed the second isomorphism theorem or the diamond isomorphism theorem (the latter name arises because of the diamond-like shape that can be used to describe the theorem).

Statement

General statement

Suppose is a group, and are two subgroups of such that normalizes ; in other words for every . Then, is a group, with (i.e., is a normal subgroup of ), and (i.e. is a normal subgroup of ), and:

Particular case

Suppose is a group, is a normal subgroup, and an arbitrary subgroup, such that . Then:

Definitions used

Term Relevant definitions(s)
normal subgroup A subgroup of a group is termed a normal subgroup if for any and , . Equivalently, is normal in if and only if for any , .
isomorphism of groups Given groups and a map is termed an isomorphism of groups if is bijective and for all .
quotient group For a normal subgroup of a group , the quotient group is the group whose elements are the cosets , and where the product of two cosets is the unique coset comprising the products of elements in the two cosets.

Particular cases

Specific possibilities for the relationship between and

Note that for each of these, if we have , then the statement made for applies to .

Situation Interpretation
is trivial In this case, and are actually the same thing, the isomorphism is the identity map, and the result gives no information.
is trivial In this case, and are both trivial groups with the trivial isomorphism between them. Again, the result gives no information.
is trivial In this case, is an internal semidirect product with normal piece and complement (and hence retract) . The result says that , i.e., complement to normal subgroup is isomorphic to quotient.
is trivial, both and normalize each other In this case, is an internal direct product of and . We get and .

Specific possibilities for and the location of and within

Nature of Nature/parameters for and Interpretation of and Interpretation of and Fact in this context that corresponds to second isomorphism theorem
group of integers , If and , then and which is cyclic of order . which is cyclic of order The arithmetic fact that , i.e., the product of two numbers equals the product of their gcd and lcm.
vector space of dimension is a subspace of dimension , is a subspace of dimension has dimension and has dimension ; these dimensions are not determined by The dimension of is and the dimension of is The isomorphism between these (which turns out to also be a vector space isomorphism) preserves dimension, and we get or . This is a vector space analogue of the inclusion-exclusion principle.
is an external direct product of groups There are subsets of such that is the subgroup where all coordinates outside are the identity, and is the subgroup where all coordinates outside are the identity. corresponds to all coordinates outside being the identity, and corresponds to . corresponds to (in a loose subgroup-quotient identification) and to . The fact that . In finite cardinality terms, .

Related facts

Facts about normal subgroups

  • Normality satisfies transfer condition: If are subgroups and is normal in , then is normal in .
  • Normality satisfies intermediate subgroup condition: If are groups and is normal in , then is normal in .

General version of the result

  • Product formula: The set-theoretic version of the product formula establishes a bijection which is the same as the bijection of the second isomorphism theorem, but without the conditions of normality. The bijection is purely at the set-theoretic level.

Facts used

  1. Subgroup containment implies coset containment

Proof

Given: A group , subgroups such that for all .

To prove: is a group, is normal in , is normal in , and .

Proof:

is a subgroup of

Condition In symbols Justification
Closure under multiplication For , want to show Observe that for some , by the condition, so .
Identity element The identity element of is in The identity element is in both and , so it is in .
Inverses Given , . Thus, the inverse of any element in is also in .

is normal in

Observe that, by the condition, for any . Thus, for and , we have . Thus, is normal in .

is normal in

We now prove that is normal in . Pick . Then such is a subgroup. Also, since for any , we have , so . Thus, , and we get that is normal in .

Definition of isomorphism and proof that it works

Finally, define the isomorphism between and as follows:

.

We check that this satisfies all the required conditions:

Condition Verification
Sends cosets to cosets Note first that if two elements are in the same coset of , they are in the same coset of . Thus, the map sends cosets of to cosets of . (This is fact (1)).
Well-defined with specified domain and co-domain Further, if , then . In other words, if the original coset is in , the new coset is in . Thus, the map is well-defined from to .
Injective Suppose . That means that , forcing . But we anyway have , so , forcing that and are in the same coset of . Thus, .
Surjective Any left coset of in can be written as where . Thus, we can write where . Then, , with . Thus, .
Homomorphism Suppose . Then, . Thus, the map is a homomorphism.

References

Textbook references

  • Abstract Algebra by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote, 10-digit ISBN 0471433349, 13-digit ISBN 978-0471433347, Page 97, Theorem 18 of Section 3.3, More info
  • Algebra by Michael Artin, ISBN 0130047635, 13-digit ISBN 978-0130047632, Page 236, Exercise 7 of Miscellaneous Problems, More info