This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in group theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
This article is about an isomorphism theorem in group theory.
View a complete list of isomorphism theorems| Read a survey article about the isomorphism theorems
Name
This result is termed the second isomorphism theorem or the diamond isomorphism theorem (the latter name arises because of the diamond-like shape that can be used to describe the theorem).
Statement
General statement
Suppose
is a group, and
are two subgroups of
such that
normalizes
; in other words
for every
. Then,
is a group, with
(i.e.,
is a normal subgroup of
), and
(i.e.
is a normal subgroup of
), and:
Particular case
Suppose
is a group,
is a normal subgroup, and
an arbitrary subgroup, such that
. Then:
Definitions used
| Term |
Relevant definitions(s)
|
| normal subgroup |
A subgroup of a group is termed a normal subgroup if for any and , . Equivalently, is normal in if and only if for any , .
|
| isomorphism of groups |
Given groups and a map is termed an isomorphism of groups if is bijective and for all .
|
| quotient group |
For a normal subgroup of a group , the quotient group is the group whose elements are the cosets , and where the product of two cosets is the unique coset comprising the products of elements in the two cosets.
|
Particular cases
Specific possibilities for the relationship between
and 
Note that for each of these, if we have
, then the statement made for
applies to
.
| Situation |
Interpretation
|
is trivial |
In this case, and are actually the same thing, the isomorphism is the identity map, and the result gives no information.
|
is trivial |
In this case, and are both trivial groups with the trivial isomorphism between them. Again, the result gives no information.
|
is trivial |
In this case, is an internal semidirect product with normal piece and complement (and hence retract) . The result says that , i.e., complement to normal subgroup is isomorphic to quotient.
|
is trivial, both and normalize each other |
In this case, is an internal direct product of and . We get and .
|
Specific possibilities for
and the location of
and
within
Nature of  |
Nature/parameters for and  |
Interpretation of and  |
Interpretation of and  |
Fact in this context that corresponds to second isomorphism theorem
|
group of integers  |
,  |
If and , then and  |
which is cyclic of order . which is cyclic of order  |
The arithmetic fact that , i.e., the product of two numbers equals the product of their gcd and lcm.
|
vector space of dimension  |
is a subspace of dimension , is a subspace of dimension  |
has dimension and has dimension ; these dimensions are not determined by  |
The dimension of is and the dimension of is  |
The isomorphism between these (which turns out to also be a vector space isomorphism) preserves dimension, and we get or . This is a vector space analogue of the inclusion-exclusion principle.
|
is an external direct product of groups  |
There are subsets of such that is the subgroup where all coordinates outside are the identity, and is the subgroup where all coordinates outside are the identity. |
corresponds to all coordinates outside being the identity, and corresponds to . |
corresponds to (in a loose subgroup-quotient identification) and to . |
The fact that . In finite cardinality terms, .
|
Related facts
Facts about normal subgroups
- Normality satisfies transfer condition: If
are subgroups and
is normal in
, then
is normal in
.
- Normality satisfies intermediate subgroup condition: If
are groups and
is normal in
, then
is normal in
.
General version of the result
- Product formula: The set-theoretic version of the product formula establishes a bijection which is the same as the bijection of the second isomorphism theorem, but without the conditions of normality. The bijection is purely at the set-theoretic level.
Facts used
- Subgroup containment implies coset containment
Proof
Given: A group
, subgroups
such that
for all
.
To prove:
is a group,
is normal in
,
is normal in
, and
.
Proof:
is a subgroup of 
| Condition |
In symbols |
Justification
|
| Closure under multiplication |
For , want to show  |
Observe that for some , by the condition, so .
|
| Identity element |
The identity element of is in  |
The identity element is in both and , so it is in .
|
| Inverses |
Given ,  |
. Thus, the inverse of any element in is also in .
|
is normal in 
Observe that, by the condition,
for any
. Thus, for
and
, we have
. Thus,
is normal in
.
is normal in 
We now prove that
is normal in
. Pick
. Then
such
is a subgroup. Also, since
for any
, we have
, so
. Thus,
, and we get that
is normal in
.
Definition of isomorphism and proof that it works
Finally, define the isomorphism
between
and
as follows:
.
We check that this satisfies all the required conditions:
| Condition |
Verification
|
| Sends cosets to cosets |
Note first that if two elements are in the same coset of , they are in the same coset of . Thus, the map sends cosets of to cosets of . (This is fact (1)).
|
| Well-defined with specified domain and co-domain |
Further, if , then . In other words, if the original coset is in , the new coset is in . Thus, the map is well-defined from to .
|
| Injective |
Suppose . That means that , forcing . But we anyway have , so , forcing that and are in the same coset of . Thus, .
|
| Surjective |
Any left coset of in can be written as where . Thus, we can write where . Then, , with . Thus, .
|
| Homomorphism |
Suppose . Then, . Thus, the map is a homomorphism.
|
References
Textbook references
- Abstract Algebra by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote, 10-digit ISBN 0471433349, 13-digit ISBN 978-0471433347, Page 97, Theorem 18 of Section 3.3, More info
- Algebra by Michael Artin, ISBN 0130047635, 13-digit ISBN 978-0130047632, Page 236, Exercise 7 of Miscellaneous Problems, More info