Hall subgroups exist in finite solvable group
Statement
Suppose is a finite solvable group, and is a prime set. Then, there exists a -Hall subgroup (?) of : a subgroup whose order and index are relatively prime, and with the property that the set of prime divisors of its order is within .
Related facts
- Hall's theorem is a converse of sorts.
- Sylow's theorem: Sylow subgroups exist, Sylow implies order-conjugate, Sylow implies order-dominating, congruence condition on Sylow numbers
- ECD condition for pi-subgroups in solvable groups: Hall subgroups exist in finite solvable, Hall implies order-conjugate in finite solvable, Hall implies order-dominating in finite solvable, congruence condition on factorization of Hall numbers
- Pi-Hall subgroups exist in pi-separable
Facts used
- Solvability is subgroup-closed
- Solvability is quotient-closed
- Minimal normal implies elementary Abelian in finite solvable
- Sylow subgroups exist
- Normality is quotient-transitive
- Frattini's argument
- Product formula
Proof
Given: A finite solvable group , a prime set .
To prove: has a -Hall subgroup.
Proof: We prove the claim by induction on the order of . The base case of the trivial group is clear.
Suppose the result is true for all finite solvable groups of order strictly less than the order of . Then, by facts (1) and (2), the result is true for all proper subgroups and all proper quotients of .
Let be a minimal normal subgroup of . By fact (3), is elementary Abelian, and in particular, is a -group for some prime divisor of . Observe that:
- Case : By applying induction to , we conclude that has a -Hall subgroup. Taking the inverse image of this in , we get a -Hall subgroup of .
- Case : By applying induction to , we conclude that has a -Hall subgroup. The inverse image of this gives a subgroup, say , of . If is not itself a -group, then is proper in , and is a proper subgroup of , then has a -Hall subgroup . Note that is relatively prime to , and is relatively prime to , so is relatively prime to . Thus, is a Hall -subgroup of .
Thus, the only case of concern is where but is a -group. Note that in this case, must be a -Sylow subgroup (since has order relatively prime to ).
Let be a subgroup of such that is a minimal normal subgroup of . Then, since the order of is not a multiple of , and is solvable, fact (3) yields that is an elementary Abelian -group for some prime . By fact (5), is itself a normal subgroup of .
Let be a -Sylow subgroup of (using fact (4)).
Now, if is normal in , then argue as before replacing by . Note that by our assumption, , so we land up in case (1).
Let's now consider the case that is not normal in . By Frattini's argument (fact (6)), . The product formula yields:
, so divides , and is hence a power of . Thus, is a power of . Thus, is a proper subgroup of whose index is a power of . By induction, has a -Hall subgroup, and this must also be a -Hall subgroup for .
References
Textbook references
- Abstract Algebra by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote, 10-digit ISBN 0471433349, 13-digit ISBN 978-0471433347, More info, Page 200, Exercise 33, Section 6.1 (-groups, nilpotent groups and solvable groups)