Central implies potentially verbal in finite
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., central subgroup of finite group) must also satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., finite-potentially verbal subgroup)
View all subgroup property implications | View all subgroup property non-implications
Get more facts about central subgroup of finite group|Get more facts about finite-potentially verbal subgroup
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two subgroup properties, when the big group is a finite group. That is, it states that in a Finite group (?), every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., Central subgroup (?)) must also satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., Potentially verbal subgroup (?)). In other words, every central subgroup of finite group is a potentially verbal subgroup of finite group.
View all subgroup property implications in finite groups View all subgroup property non-implications in finite groups View all subgroup property implications View all subgroup property non-implications
Statement
Suppose is a finite group and is a central subgroup of . Then, there exists a finite group containing such that is a Verbal subgroup (?) of .
Related facts
Stronger facts and other corollaries of those stronger facts
- Central implies finite-pi-potentially verbal in finite
- Central implies finite-pi-potentially fully invariant in finite
- Central implies potentially fully invariant in finite
- Central implies finite-pi-potentially characteristic in finite
Weaker facts
- Abelian direct factor implies potentially verbal in finite: The proof is essentially the same, using direct products instead of central products.
- Cyclic normal implies finite-pi-potentially verbal in finite, cyclic normal implies potentially verbal in finite
- Homocyclic normal implies finite-pi-potentially fully invariant in finite, homocyclic normal implies potentially fully invariant in finite
Facts used
Proof
The result follows directly from fact (1), which is a stronger version of the same statement.