Thompson's replacement theorem for abelian subgroups

From Groupprops

This article defines a replacement theorem
View a complete list of replacement theorems| View a complete list of failures of replacement

Statement

Suppose is a group of prime power order (we'll call the prime ).

Let denote the set of all abelian subgroups of maximum order in (i.e., for all abelian subgroups of ).

Suppose and is an abelian subgroup such that normalizes but does not normalize . Then, there exists an abelian subgroup of such that:

  1. .
  2. is a proper subgroup of .
  3. is contained in , i.e., it is contained in the normal closure of in . In particular, it is contained in the normal closure of in .
  4. normalizes .

We have the following additional conclusions:

  1. normalizes : Note that since is contained in , and by assumption, we see that normalizes as well.
  2. is a proper subgroup of : This is because cannot contain , since normalizes but does not normalize .

Thus, all the conditions assumed for also hold for , except possibly the fact that does not normalize . Hence, the term replacement.

Related facts

Similar replacement theorems

For a complete list of replacement theorems, refer:

Category:Replacement theorems

Applications

Facts used

  1. Thompson's lemma on product with centralizer of commutator with abelian subgroup of maximum order
  2. Nilpotent implies center is normality-large
  3. Normality satisfies image condition

Proof

This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format

Given: A finite -group . is the set of abelian subgroups of of maximum order. , and is a subgroup of such that normalizes but does not normalize .

To prove: There exists such that is a proper subgroup of , normalizes and , and is contained in .

Proof: We let and .

basic diagram of key initial constructions (steps 1-6)
More detailed diagram
Step no. Assertion Facts used Given data used Proof steps used Explanation
1 is a subgroup of , and is normal in -- normalizes -- [SHOW MORE]
2 normalizes -- is abelian -- [SHOW MORE]
3 normalizes -- normalizes -- [SHOW MORE]
4 is normal in -- -- steps (2), (3) [SHOW MORE]
5 is a proper subgroup of -- does not normalize [SHOW MORE]
6 is a nontrivial normal subgroup of fact (3) -- steps (1), (4), (5) [SHOW MORE]
7 is nontrivial fact (2) -- step (6) Direct combination of the facts
8 Let be such that its image mod is a nontrivial element in . Then is contained in and hence in step (7) Note that step (7) guarantees the existence of such . [SHOW MORE]
9 is an abelian subgroup of is abelian step (8) [SHOW MORE]
10 is an abelian subgroup of maximum order in fact (1) is abelian of maximum order step (9) Piece together.
11 is contained in is abelian step (8) [SHOW MORE]
12 is contained in -- step (11) [SHOW MORE]
13 normalizes step (8) [SHOW MORE]
14 is not contained in step (8) [SHOW MORE]
15 is not contained in steps (8), (14) [SHOW MORE]
16 is contained in steps (1), (8), (10) [SHOW MORE]
17 is contained in . steps (8), (9), (10) [SHOW MORE]
18 normalizes step (1), (16) [SHOW MORE]

The conclusions of steps (10), (12), (13), (15), (16), (17), and (18) complete the proof.

Conceptual summary of proof

The key idea of the proof is to use fact (1) somehow, and this requires finding a suitable such that is abelian. and the resulting subgroup that we get is nice enough.

Working backward from this, we see that we would like that not be a subgroup of , which in turn means that we want outside . On the other hand, we do want to normalize , which means that we want to lie inside . Finally, we would like so that the subsequent group constructed is in . With all these considerations, we should aim to find outside but inside , but such that .

This motivation now allows us to work out the proof details given above. Here is a rough outline of the proof:

  • Steps (1)-(6) set things up. The fact that does not normalize is used to show that is a nontrivial normal subgroup of .
  • The crucial steps for the construction are (7) and (8), that involve the choice of . Steps (9) and (10) now use fact (1) to get a hold on .
  • The remaining steps help us get a clearer idea of the subgroup inclusions and prove the remaining desired properties for .

GAP implementation

Here is a GAP implementation of the constructive approach used in the proof:

ThompsonsReplacementAbelian := function(P,A,B)
        local C,N,x,M,CAM,Astar;
        C := Group(Union(A,B));
        N := Normalizer(B,A);
        x := Filtered(Set(B),y -> (not(y in N)) and IsSubgroup(N,CommutatorSubgroup(Group(y),C)))[1];
        M := Group(List(Set(A),y -> x^(-1) * y^(-1) * x * y));
        CAM := Centralizer(A,M);
        Astar := Group(Union(M,CAM));
        return Astar;
end;;

References

Textbook references

Journal references