Subnormality of fixed depth satisfies intermediate subgroup condition
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., subnormal subgroup) satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., intermediate subgroup condition)
View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about subnormal subgroup |Get facts that use property satisfaction of subnormal subgroup | Get facts that use property satisfaction of subnormal subgroup|Get more facts about intermediate subgroup condition
Statement
Verbal statement
A subnormal subgroup of a group is also subnormal in every intermediate subgroup. In fact, its subnormal depth in any intermediate subgroup is bounded from above by the subnormal depth in the whole group.
Property-theoretic statement
The subgroup property of being a subnormal subgroup satisfies the subgroup metaproperty called the intermediate subgroup condition -- any subnormal subgroup of the whole group is also subnormal in every intermediate subgroup.
Statement with symbols
Suppose is a subnormal subgroup of a group . Then, for any intermediate subgroup (i.e., ), is subnormal in . Moreover, if is -subnormal in , is also -subnormal in . (Here, when we say -subnormal, we mean the subnormal depth is at most ).
Related facts
Generalizations
Related facts about normality and subnormality
- Normality is strongly UL-intersection-closed
- Normality satisfies transfer condition
- Normality satisfies inverse image condition
- Normality satisfies intermediate subgroup condition
Facts used
- Normality satisfies transfer condition: If are subgroups such that is normal in , then is normal in .
Proof
Hands-on proof
Given: A group , a -subnormal subgroup , a subgroup such that .
To prove: is -subnormal in .
Proof: Consider a subnormal series for of length :
.
where is normal in for each . We claim that the series:
is a subnormal series for in . For this, observe that:
.
We know that is normal in , so by fact (1), is normal in , yielding that is normal in , as desired.