Subnormal subgroup has a unique fastest descending subnormal series
Statement
Suppose is a subnormal subgroup of of subnormal depth ; in other words, there exists a subnormal series for of the form:
,
where each is subnormal in .
Then, consider the following descending chain of subgroups:
- .
- is the normal closure of in .
Then , and the series:
is a subnormal series for : each is subnormal in . Further, it is the fastest descending subnormal series for in : we have for all .
Related facts
This result shows that for any subnormal subgroup, there is a unique subnormal series for it that descends the fastest: the subnormal series defined by taking successive normal closures. It also shows that to compute the subnormal depth (i.e., the minimum possible length of a subnormal series) it suffices to compute the length of this particular subnormal series.
A subnormal subgroup need not in general have a fastest ascending subnormal series. Here are some related facts:
- 2-subnormal subgroup has a unique fastest ascending subnormal series
- 2-subnormal not implies hypernormalized: We cannot hope, in general, to construct a subnormal series for a subnormal subgroup by taking successive normalizers.
- 2-subnormal and abnormal normalizer not implies normal: Even for a 2-subnormal subgroup, the normalizer need not be normal. In fact, there exist 2-subnormal subgroups that are not normal, but whose normalizer is abnormal.
- 3-subnormal subgroup need not have a unique fastest ascending subnormal series
- 2-subnormal and hypernormalized not implies 2-hypernormalized: Even if a subgroup is hypernormalized, the series of normalizers may not be the fastest ascending subnormal series.
Facts used
- Normality satisfies transfer condition: If and is normal in , then is normal in .
Proof
Given: is a subnormal subgroup of of subnormal depth ; in other words, there exists a subnormal series for of the form:
,
where each is subnormal in .
To prove: Consider the following descending chain of subgroups:
- .
- is the normal closure of in .
Then , and the series:
is a subnormal series for : each is subnormal in . Further, it is the fastest descending subnormal series for in : we have for all .
Proof:
- (Facts used: fact (1)): : We prove this by induction on . We know that by definition. Suppose we have . Then, is normal in , so by fact (1), is a normal subgroup of and it contains . By definition, is the smallest normal subgroup of in , so we get .
- : This follows directly from step (1), setting .
- The s form a subnormal series: By definition, is the normal closure of in , so is normal in .