Equivalence of definitions of CA-group
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term CA-group
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent
| No. | Shorthand | A group is termed a CN-group if ... | A group is termed a CN-group if ... |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | element centralizers are abelian | the centralizer of any non-identity element is an abelian subgroup. | for every non-identity element , the centralizer (i.e., the set of all elements of that commute with ) is an abelian subgroup of . |
| 2 | subgroup centralizers are abelian | the centralizer of any nontrivial subgroup is an abelian subgroup. | for every nontrivial subgroup of , the centralizer is an abelian subgroup of . |
| 3 | subgroups: abelian or centerless | every subgroup of the group is either an abelian group or a centerless group. | for every nontrivial subgroup of , either is abelian or is centerless, i.e., the center of is trivial. |
Related facts
Facts used
Proof
(1) implies (2)
Given: A group such that, for every non-identity element , the centralizer is abelian.
To prove: is abelian.
Proof: Since is nontrivial, there exists a non-identity element . We have by definition of centralizer that . The latter is abelian by assumption, hence, by Fact (1), is abelian as well.
(2) implies (3)
Given: A group such that for every nontrivial subgroup of , is abelian. A subgroup of .
To prove: If the center of is nontrivial, then is abelian.
Proof: If the center is nontrivial, then . The group is abelian by assumption, so by Fact (1), is abelian.
(3) implies (1)
Given: A group with the property that for every subgroup of , is either abelian or centerless. A non-identity element .
To prove: is abelian.
Proof: Let . Note that , hence . Thus, is not centerless. This forces it to be abelian, completing the proof.