Equivalence of definitions of CA-group

From Groupprops

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term CA-group
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent

No. Shorthand A group is termed a CN-group if ... A group is termed a CN-group if ...
1 element centralizers are abelian the centralizer of any non-identity element is an abelian subgroup. for every non-identity element , the centralizer (i.e., the set of all elements of that commute with ) is an abelian subgroup of .
2 subgroup centralizers are abelian the centralizer of any nontrivial subgroup is an abelian subgroup. for every nontrivial subgroup of , the centralizer is an abelian subgroup of .
3 subgroups: abelian or centerless every subgroup of the group is either an abelian group or a centerless group. for every nontrivial subgroup of , either is abelian or is centerless, i.e., the center of is trivial.

Related facts

Facts used

  1. Abelianness is subgroup-closed

Proof

(1) implies (2)

Given: A group such that, for every non-identity element , the centralizer is abelian.

To prove: is abelian.

Proof: Since is nontrivial, there exists a non-identity element . We have by definition of centralizer that . The latter is abelian by assumption, hence, by Fact (1), is abelian as well.

(2) implies (3)

Given: A group such that for every nontrivial subgroup of , is abelian. A subgroup of .

To prove: If the center of is nontrivial, then is abelian.

Proof: If the center is nontrivial, then . The group is abelian by assumption, so by Fact (1), is abelian.

(3) implies (1)

Given: A group with the property that for every subgroup of , is either abelian or centerless. A non-identity element .

To prove: is abelian.

Proof: Let . Note that , hence . Thus, is not centerless. This forces it to be abelian, completing the proof.