Equivalence of definitions of CN-group

From Groupprops

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term CN-group
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent

No. Shorthand A group is termed a CN-group if ... A group is termed a CN-group if ...
1 element centralizers are nilpotent the centralizer of any non-identity element is a nilpotent subgroup. for every non-identity element , the centralizer (i.e., the set of all elements of that commute with ) is a nilpotent subgroup of .
2 subgroup centralizers are nilpotent the centralizer of any nontrivial subgroup is a nilpotent subgroup. for every nontrivial subgroup of , the centralizer is a nilpotent subgroup of .
3 subgroups: nilpotent or centerless every subgroup of the group is either a nilpotent group or a centerless group. for every nontrivial subgroup of , either is nilpotent or is centerless, i.e., the center of is trivial.

Facts used

  1. Nilpotency is subgroup-closed

Proof

(1) implies (2)

Given: A group such that, for every non-identity element , the centralizer is nilpotent.

To prove: is nilpotent.

Proof: Since is nontrivial, there exists a non-identity element . We have by definition of centralizer that . The latter is nilpotent by assumption, hence, by Fact (1), is nilpotent as well.

(2) implies (3)

Given: A group such that for every nontrivial subgroup of , is nilpotent. A subgroup of .

To prove: If the center of is nontrivial, then is nilpotent.

Proof: . The group is nilpotent by assumption, so by Fact (1), is nilpotent.

(3) implies (1)

Given: A group with the property that for every subgroup of , is either nilpotent or centerless. A non-identity element .

To prove: is nilpotent.

Proof: Let . Note that , hence . Thus, is not centerless. This forces it to be nilpotent, completing the proof.