Cofactorial automorphism-invariance is not transitive
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., cofactorial automorphism-invariant subgroup) not satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., transitive subgroup property).
View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions|Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about cofactorial automorphism-invariant subgroup|Get more facts about transitive subgroup property|
Statement
It is possible to have groups such that is a cofactorial automorphism-invariant subgroup of and is a cofactorial automorphism-invariant subgroup of , but is not a cofactorial automorphism-invariant subgroup of .
The key observation here is that the set of prime divisors of the order of may be a proper subset of the set of prime divisors of the order of . Shrinkage in the set of prime divisors is necessary to construct a counterexample.
Facts used
Proof
By Fact (1), we can find a prime number and -groups such that is -automorphism-invariant in but not characteristic in . In particular, we can find an automorphism of of order relatively prime to such that is not invariant under that automorphism. Define as the semidirect product of by the cyclic group generated by that automorphism. Then:
- is cofactorial automorphism-invariant in : is the only prime dividing the order of , and is invariant under -automorphisms.
- is cofactorial automorphism-invariant in : In fact, is a normal Sylow subgroup of and hence a characteristic subgroup of . So it is invariant under all automorphisms of .
- is not cofactorial automorphism-invariant in : It is not invariant under the conjugation operation by the generator of the cyclic -group.
Concretely, using the minimal example provided in the proof of Fact (1), we obtain that for any odd prime, we can construct to have orders respectively.