Classification of finite p-groups with cyclic maximal subgroup

From Groupprops

This article gives a classification statement for certain kinds of groups of prime power order, subject to additional constraints.
View other such statements

This page classifies all finite -groups that possess a cyclic maximal subgroup.

Statement

For odd primes

Let be an odd prime, and be a group of order with a cyclic maximal subgroup (so ). Then, there are two possibilities for :

  1. is isomorphic to , with being the first direct factor (we could choose other isomorphisms where is not one of the direct factors).
  2. is isomorphic to , with the isomorphism sending to the subgroup of multiples of
  3. is an internal semidirect product of the subgroup and a cyclic group of order , whose generator acts on via multiplication by .

When , then (2) and (3) are equivalent, for , we get three possible isomorphism classes for from the above.

For the prime 2

Let be a group of order with a cyclic maximal subgroup . Then, there are six possibilities for :

  1. is isomorphic to , with being the first direct factor (we could choose other isomorphisms where is not one of the direct factors).
  2. is isomorphic to , with the isomorphism sending to the subgroup of multiples of
  3. is a dihedral group: it is a semidirect product of and a cyclic group of order two, which acts on via multiplication by -1.
  4. is a semidirect product of and a cyclic group of order two, which acts on via multiplication by .
  5. is a semidirect product of and a cyclic group of order two, which acts on via multiplication by
  6. is a generalized quaternion group

Generalizations

Proof for odd primes

We first outline a naive proof, after which we see a slicker proof using the ideas of second cohomology of cyclic groups.

Since is a -group, it is nilpotent, so any subgroup of index is normal. Thus, . Pick a . Then, conjugation by induces an automorphism of . Moreover, , because has index , so is conjugation by some element of . Since is cyclic and hence Abelian, must therefore be the identity map. Thus is an automorphism of that has order either 1 or .

Case that has order one

In this case, is generated by and an element that commutes with , so is Abelian. (For convenience we use multiplicative notation in ). There are two possibilities:

  1. is not a generator for : Then, by the structure of cyclic groups there exists such that . Then the subgroup generated by is cyclic of order , and is an internal direct product of with this cyclic subgroup.
  2. is a generator for : In this case, is cyclic of order

Case that has order

In this case, the subgroup generated by is a subgroup of order in the multiplicative group mod . But there's only one such subgroup: the multiplicative subgroup comprising multiplications by . Replacing by a suitable power thereof, we can assume that acts as multiplication by .

Further, it is clear that cannot be equal to a generator of , because otherwise would commute with making the group Abelian and trivial. Thus, there exists such that .

Now consider the element . We want to show that is the identity. First, let's compute the commutator of and :

Thus, the commutator has order and commutes with both and .

Now, use the fact that since the commutator of and commutes with both and , the subgroup they generate is nilpotent of class two, so using the formula for powers of product in group of class two, we have:

Since the commutator has order , its th power is the identity, so the power of the commutator is trivial. Further, since , the left side is trivial, so we get is trivial.

Thus, the element generates a cyclic subgroup of order , whose internal semidirect product with is .

Proof at the prime 2

The main difference between the prime 2 and the odd primes is the fact that the multiplicative group mod is not cyclic, and thus it has four possible squareroots of 1. Hence, there are four different possible actions that the quotient can have on , and we need to classify all possible groups for each of the actions.

The other main difference is that while for odd primes , divides , this isn't true for 2, so applying the formula for product of powers yields weaker results.

As in the previous situation, let be an element in , let be the automorphism of induced via conjugation by . As before, , and is Abelian, so is the identity on .

Case that has order 1

In this case, commutes with , so is Abelian. There are two possibilities:

  1. is not a generator for . Then for some , so is the identity. Then is an internal direct product of and the subgroup generated by
  2. is a generator for . Then, is cyclic of order .

Case that is the inverse map

If has order 2, it must be an element of order 2 in the automorphism group of . There are three such elements: multiplication by , multiplication by and multiplication by . (since we'll use multiplicative notation for , we'll effectively be talking of raising to the powers of the numbers).

Let's first consider the case that acts as multiplication by . In multiplicative notation, . Our goal is now to answer the question: can we find some element in the coset of that has order 2 in ? If not, can we still find some element of small order? We try to repeat the procedure we followed last time.

Clearly but is not a generator of , because otherwise would be cyclic. So there exists such that .

Using group cohomology for odd primes

Let denote the cyclic group of order and denote the cyclic group of order , where . We want to classify all groups of order with a normal subgroup isomorphic to and quotient group isomorphic to .

Classifying the possible actions

The first step behind classification is to find all elements of:

Let's do this. By definition, is a cyclic group of order and the Sylow -subgroup is obtained as multiplications by for integers . The only elements of order in this are elements of the form . Thus, there are possible homomorphisms from to , the homomorphisms sending the generator to for different possible values of .

Further, the homomorphisms fall into two equivalence classes modulo automorphisms of : the trivial homomorphism, and the homomorphism sending the generator to multiplication by . Thus, it suffices to classify all congruence classes of extensions for these two actions.

Computing congruence classes of extensions for the trivial action

We first compute the second cohomology group for the trivial homomorphism.

Let us apply the result discussed in the second cohomology of cyclic groups. Here, the action is trivial, so the feasible cocycles are given by:

which is clearly the whole of . On the other hand, the coboundaries are given by (the sum here is times):

which is the subgroup of multiples of .

Thus, the second cohomology group is . A concrete interpretation of this:

  • The zero element in this cohomology group corresponds to the direct product of and .
  • Any nonzero element in this cohomology group corresponds to the cyclic group of order . All these are related by automorphisms of the extension.

Thus, up to automorphisms, there are only two congruence classes of extensions for the trivial action: the direct product, and the cyclic group.

Computing congruence classes of extensions for the nontrivial action

Using the results discussed in second cohomology of cyclic groups, it follows that the second cohomology group is given as the following quotient:

The expression in the numerator is the group of feasible cocycles, and the expression in the denominator is the group of coboundaries. Clearly, the expression in the numerator is , and the expression in the denominator is also , so the quotient is trivial. In other words, the second cohomology group is trivial, and thus, every extension corresponding to this action splits.

Using group cohomology for the prime 2

Let denote the cyclic group of order and denote the cyclic group of order , where . We want to classify all groups of order with a normal subgroup isomorphic to having quotient group isomorphic to .

Classifying the possible actions

The actions of on are given by elements of the set:

Now, is a direct product of a cyclic group of order and a cyclic group of order . It has three elements of order two, as well as the identity element, so there are four possible homomorphisms from to this group. The four elements are:

  • The identity map.
  • The multiplication by map (or the inverse map).
  • The multiplication by map.
  • The multiplication by map.

The second cohomology group for the trivial action

We first compute the second cohomology group for the trivial homomorphism.

Let us apply the result discussed in the second cohomology of cyclic groups. Here, the action is trivial, so the feasible cocycles are given by:

which is clearly the whole of . On the other hand, the coboundaries are given by:

which is the subgroup . Thus, the quotient, which is the second cohomology group, is cyclic of order two:

  • The trivial element corresponds to the direct product of and .
  • The nontrivial element corresponds to a cyclic group of order .

The second cohomology group for the inverse map

The second cohomology group is given by:

The group on top is a subgroup of order two, and the group at the bottom is trivial, so the quotient is cyclic of order two. Thus, there are two such groups. These are described specifically as the dihedral group of order and the generalized quaternion group of order .

The second cohomology groups for

There are both trivial. The second cohomology group for multiplication by is given by:

both the groups here are , so the quotient is trivial.

For multiplication by , the second cohomology group is given by:

Both the groups here are , and the quotient is trivial.

References

Textbook references