Number of irreducible representations equals number of conjugacy classes
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term number of conjugacy classes
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
Consider a finite group and a splitting field for . Then, the following two numbers are equal:
- The Number of conjugacy classes (?) in .
- The number of Irreducible linear representation (?)s (up to equivalence) of over .
Note that any algebraically closed field whose characteristic does not divide the order of is a splitting field, so in particular, we can always take or .
Related facts
For more facts about the degrees of irreducible representations, see degrees of irreducible representations.
Similar facts for irreducible representations of specific types
Similar facts over non-splitting fields
| Field | Corresponding notion to irreducible representation | Corresponding notion to conjugacy class | Statement |
|---|---|---|---|
| -- field of rational numbers | irreducible representation over rational numbers (need not be absolutely irreducible) | rational conjugacy class, or equivalently, equivalence class under the equivalence relation of generating conjugate cyclic subgroups | Number of irreducible representations over rationals equals number of rational conjugacy classes which in turn equals the number of conjugacy classes of cyclic subgroups. |
| -- field of real numbers | irreducible representation over real numbers (need not be absolutely irreducible) | real conjugacy class, i.e., the union of a conjugacy class and the conjugacy class of its inverse elements | Number of irreducible representations over reals equals number of real conjugacy classes |
Similar facts under action of automorphism group
- Cyclic quotient of automorphism group by class-preserving automorphism group implies same orbit sizes of conjugacy classes and irreducible representations under automorphism group: In particular, if the quotient of the automorphism group by the group of class-preserving automorphisms is cyclic, then the number of equivalence classes of irreducible representations up to automorphisms of the group equals the number of equivalence classes of elements under group automorphisms.
Opposite facts under action of automorphism group
Similar arithmetic fact
Particular cases
Families
|}