Classification of groups of prime-cube order: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
Line 85: Line 85:
| 4 || <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> do not commute. || || || Steps (2), (3) || <toggledisplay>If <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> commute, then <math>C_P(a)</math> contains <math>Z,a,b</math>, hence equals all of <math>P</math>. Thus, <math>a \in Z</math>, so its image in <math>P/Z</matH> is the identity element, a contradiction to what we assumed.</toggledisplay>
| 4 || <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> do not commute. || || || Steps (2), (3) || <toggledisplay>If <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> commute, then <math>C_P(a)</math> contains <math>Z,a,b</math>, hence equals all of <math>P</math>. Thus, <math>a \in Z</math>, so its image in <math>P/Z</matH> is the identity element, a contradiction to what we assumed.</toggledisplay>
|-
|-
| 5 || Let <math>z = [a,b]</math>. Then, <math>z</math> is a non-identity element of <math>Z</math>. || || || Steps (1), (4) || <toggledisplay>We must have <math>z \in P'</math>, which equals <math>Z</math> by Step (1). By Step (4), <math>[a,b]</math> is not the identity element. So <math>z</math> is a non-identity element of <math>Z</math>.</toggledisplay>
| 5 || Let <math>z = [a,b]</math>. Then, <math>z</math> is a non-identity element of <math>Z</math> and <math>\langle z \rangle = Z</math>. || || || Steps (1), (4) || <toggledisplay>We must have <math>z \in P'</math>, which equals <math>Z</math> by Step (1). By Step (4), <math>[a,b]</math> is not the identity element. So <math>z</math> is a non-identity element of <math>Z</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
| 6 || The elements <math>a,b</math> both have order either <math>p</math> or <math>p^2</math>. || || || || <toggledisplay>The order of <math>a</math> must divide the order of the group, which is <math>p^3</math>. It cannot equal <math>p^3</math>, because that would make the group cyclic and hence abelian. It cannot equal <math>1</math>, because <math>a</math> is a non-identity element. The only possibilities are <math>p</math> and <math>p^2</math>. The same goes for <math>b</math>.</toggledisplay>
|}
|}
We now make cases based on the orders of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>. Note that these cases may turn out to yield isomorphic groups, because the cases are made based on <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>, and there is some freedom in selecting these.
'''Case A''': <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> both have order <math>p</math>.

Revision as of 23:18, 10 April 2011

Statement

Let be a prime number. Then there are, up to isomorphism, five groups of order . These include three abelian groups and two non-abelian groups. The nature of the two non-abelian groups is somewhat different for the case .

For more information on side-by-side comparison of the groups for odd primes, see groups of prime-cube order. For information for the prime 2, see groups of order 8

The three abelian groups

The three abelian groups correspond to the three partitions of 3:

Partition of 3 Corresponding abelian group GAP ID among groups of order
3 cyclic group of prime-cube order, denoted or , or 1
2 + 1 direct product of cyclic group of prime-square order and cyclic group of prime order, denoted or 2
1 + 1 + 1 elementary abelian group of prime-cube order, denoted , or , or 5

The two non-abelian groups

For the case , these are dihedral group:D8 (GAP ID: (8,3)) and quaternion group (GAP ID: (8,4)).

For the case of odd , these are prime-cube order group:U(3,p) (GAP ID: (,3)) and semidirect product of cyclic group of prime-square order and cyclic group of prime order (GAP ID: (,4)).

Facts used

  1. Prime power order implies not centerless
  2. Center is normal
  3. Cyclic over central implies abelian
  4. Lagrange's theorem
  5. Equivalence of definitions of group of prime order: This basically states that any group of prime order must be cyclic.
  6. Classification of groups of prime-square order
  7. Structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups

Proof

First part of proof: crude descriptions of center and quotient by center

Given: A prime number , a group of order .

To prove: Either is abelian, or we have: is a cyclic group of order and is an elementary abelian group of order

Proof: Let be the center of .

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 is nontrivial Fact (1) has order , specifically, a power of a prime Fact+Given direct
2 The order of cannot be Facts (2), (3), (4), (5) has order [SHOW MORE]
3 The order of is either or Fact (4) has order Steps (1), (2) [SHOW MORE]
4 If has order , then is cyclic of order and the quotient is elementary abelian of order Facts (3), (4), (5), (6) has order . [SHOW MORE]
5 If has order , is abelian. has order . [SHOW MORE]
6 We get the desired result. Steps (3), (4), (5) Step-combination.

Second part of proof: classifying the abelian groups

This classification follows from fact (7): the abelian groups of order correspond to partitions of 3, as indicated in the original statement of the classification.

Third part of proof: classifying the non-abelian groups

Given: A non-abelian group of order . Let be the center of .

Previous steps: is cyclic of order , and is elementary abelian of order .

We first make some additional observations.

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 The derived subgroup (commutator subgroup) equals . is non-abelian of order . is abelian, has order . [SHOW MORE]
2 We can find elements such that the images of in are non-identity elements of that generate it. is elementary abelian of order [SHOW MORE]
3 together generate .
4 and do not commute. Steps (2), (3) [SHOW MORE]
5 Let . Then, is a non-identity element of and . Steps (1), (4) [SHOW MORE]
6 The elements both have order either or . [SHOW MORE]

We now make cases based on the orders of and . Note that these cases may turn out to yield isomorphic groups, because the cases are made based on and , and there is some freedom in selecting these.

Case A: and both have order .