Direct factor not implies amalgam-characteristic: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(Created page with '{{subgroup property non-implication| stronger = direct factor| weaker = amalgam-characteristic subgroup}} ==Statement== It is possible to have a group <math>G</math> and a ...')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 15: Line 15:
* [[Characteristic not implies amalgam-characteristic]]
* [[Characteristic not implies amalgam-characteristic]]


===Opposite facts===
* [[Central implies amalgam-characteristic]]
* [[Normal subgroup contained in the hypercenter is amalgam-characteristic]]
* [[Finite normal implies amalgam-characteristic]]
* [[Periodic normal implies amalgam-characteristic]]
==Proof==
==Proof==



Latest revision as of 16:19, 30 May 2009

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., direct factor) need not satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., amalgam-characteristic subgroup)
View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications
Get more facts about direct factor|Get more facts about amalgam-characteristic subgroup

EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property direct factor but not amalgam-characteristic subgroup|View examples of subgroups satisfying property direct factor and amalgam-characteristic subgroup

Statement

It is possible to have a group and a direct factor of such that is not a characteristic subgroup in the amalgamated free product .

Related facts

Similar facts

Opposite facts

Proof

Example of the free group

Let be a free group on two generators and be the group of integers. Let and be the embedded first direct factor. We have:

.

Thus, is a direct product of two copies of the free group on two generators, and moreover, the embedded subgroup in is simply , the first embedded direct factor. This is not a characteristic subgroup in , because there exists an exchange automorphism swapping the two direct factors of .