Left coset of a subgroup: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
Let <math>H</math> be a [[subgroup]] of a [[group]] <math>G</math>. Then, a '''left coset''' of <math>H</math> is a nonempty set <math>S \subset G</math> satisfying the following equivalent properties:
Let <math>H</math> be a [[subgroup]] of a [[group]] <math>G</math>. Then, a '''left coset''' of <math>H</math> is a nonempty set <math>S \subset G</math> satisfying the following equivalent properties:


* <math>x^{-1}y</math> is in <math>H</math> for any <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> in <math>S</math>, and for any fixed <math>x \in S</math>, the map <math>y \mapsto x^{-1}y</math> is a surjection from <math>S</math> to <math>H</math>
# <math>x^{-1}y</math> is in <math>H</math> for any <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> in <math>S</math>, and for any fixed <math>x \in S</math>, the map <math>y \mapsto x^{-1}y</math> is a surjection from <math>S</math> to <math>H</math>
* There exists an <math>x</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>S = xH</math> (here <math>xH</math> is the set of all <math>xh</math> with <math>h \in H</math>)
# There exists an <math>x</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>S = xH</math> (here <math>xH</math> is the set of all <math>xh</math> with <math>h \in H</math>)
* For any <math>x</math> in <math>S</math>, <math>S = xH</math>
# For any <math>x</math> in <math>S</math>, <math>S = xH</math>
 
Any element <math>x \in S</math> is termed a ''coset representative'' for <math>S</math>.


===Equivalence of definitions===
===Equivalence of definitions===
Line 22: Line 24:


Every subset that occurs as a left coset of a subgroup also occurs as a [[right coset]]. In fact, the left coset <math>xH</math> occurs as the right coset <math>(xHx^{-1})x</math> with <math>xHx^{-1}</math> being the new subgroup.
Every subset that occurs as a left coset of a subgroup also occurs as a [[right coset]]. In fact, the left coset <math>xH</math> occurs as the right coset <math>(xHx^{-1})x</math> with <math>xHx^{-1}</math> being the new subgroup.
===Natural isomorphism of left cosets with right cosets===
There is a natural bijection between the set of left cosets of a subgroup and the set of right cosets of that subgroup. This bijection arises from the natural antiautomorphism of a group defined by the map sending each element to its inverse. {{further|[[Left and right coset spaces are naturally isomorphic]]}}


==Numerical facts==
==Numerical facts==
Line 39: Line 45:
This incidentally also proves [[Lagrange's theorem]] -- the order of any subgroup of a finite group divides the order of the whole group.
This incidentally also proves [[Lagrange's theorem]] -- the order of any subgroup of a finite group divides the order of the whole group.


==Natural isomorphism of left cosets with right cosets==
<section end=main/>
 
==References==


There is a natural bijection between the set of left cosets of a subgroup and the set of right cosets of that subgroup. This bijection arises from the natural antiautomorphism of a group defined by the map sending each element to its inverse. {{further|[[Left and right coset spaces are naturally isomorphic]]}}
* {{booklink-defined|DummitFoote}}, Page 77 (formal definition, along with [[right coset]])
<section end=main/>
* {{booklink-defined|AlperinBell}}, Page 5 (definition introduced in paragraph)
* {{booklink-defined|RobinsonGT}}, Page 10
* {{booklink-defined|RobinsonAA}}, Page 51
* {{booklink-defined|Lang}}, Page 12
* {{booklink-defined|Fraleigh}}, Page 121 (formal definition, along with [[right coset]])
* {{booklink-defined|Hungerford}}, Page 38 (definition introduced after Theorem 4.2, which is about [[left congruence]] and [[right congruence]]; introduced along with [[right coset]])
* {{booklink-defined|Gallian}}, Page 132
* {{booklink-defined|Herstein}}, Page 47, Exercise 5 (definition introduced in exercise)

Revision as of 23:45, 24 May 2008

This article is about a basic definition in group theory. The article text may, however, contain advanced material.
VIEW: Definitions built on this | Facts about this: (facts closely related to Left coset of a subgroup, all facts related to Left coset of a subgroup) |Survey articles about this | Survey articles about definitions built on this
VIEW RELATED: Analogues of this | Variations of this | Opposites of this |[SHOW MORE]

Definition

Definition with symbols

Let be a subgroup of a group . Then, a left coset of is a nonempty set satisfying the following equivalent properties:

  1. is in for any and in , and for any fixed , the map is a surjection from to
  2. There exists an in such that (here is the set of all with )
  3. For any in ,

Any element is termed a coset representative for .

Equivalence of definitions

For full proof, refer: Equivalence of definitions of left coset

Facts

Left congruence

The left cosets of a subgroup are pairwise disjoint, and hence form a partition of the group. The relation of being in the same left coset is an equivalence relation on the group, and this equivalence relation is termed the left congruence induced by the subgroup.

Relation with right coset

Every subset that occurs as a left coset of a subgroup also occurs as a right coset. In fact, the left coset occurs as the right coset with being the new subgroup.

Natural isomorphism of left cosets with right cosets

There is a natural bijection between the set of left cosets of a subgroup and the set of right cosets of that subgroup. This bijection arises from the natural antiautomorphism of a group defined by the map sending each element to its inverse. Further information: Left and right coset spaces are naturally isomorphic

Numerical facts

Size of each left coset

Let be a subgroup of and be any element of . Then, the map sending in to is a bijection from to .

For full proof, refer: Left cosets are in bijection via left multiplication

Number of left cosets

The number of left cosets of a subgroup is termed the index of that subgroup.

Since all left cosets have the same size as the subgroup, we have a formula for the index of the subgroup when the whole group is finite: it is the ratio of the order of the group to the order of the subgroup.

This incidentally also proves Lagrange's theorem -- the order of any subgroup of a finite group divides the order of the whole group.

References