Zassenhaus isomorphism theorem: Difference between revisions
m (→Proof: fixed syntax error) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
'''Given''': <math>A, B, C, D</math> are subgroups of a group <math>G</math> such that <math>A</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>B</math> and <math>C</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>D</math>. | '''Given''': <math>A, B, C, D</math> are subgroups of a group <math>G</math> such that <math>A</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>B</math> and <math>C</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>D</math>. | ||
'''To prove''': <math>C(D \cap A)</math> is normal in <math>C(D \cap B)</math> and <math>A(C \cap D) is normal in <math>A(B \cap D)</math>, and we have an isomorphism: | '''To prove''': <math>C(D \cap A)</math> is normal in <math>C(D \cap B)</math> and <math>A(C \cap D)</math> is normal in <math>A(B \cap D)</math>, and we have an isomorphism: | ||
<math>\frac{C(D \cap B)}{C(D \cap A)} \cong \frac{A(B \cap D)}{A(B \cap C)}</math>. | <math>\frac{C(D \cap B)}{C(D \cap A)} \cong \frac{A(B \cap D)}{A(B \cap C)}</math>. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:48, 14 October 2023
This article describes a fact or result that is not basic but it still well-established and standard. The fact may involve terms that are themselves non-basic
View other semi-basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
This article is about an isomorphism theorem in group theory.
View a complete list of isomorphism theorems| Read a survey article about the isomorphism theorems
Statement
Suppose are subgroups of a group such that is a normal subgroup of and is a normal subgroup of . Then, is normal in and is normal in , and we have an isomorphism:
.
Facts used
- Normality satisfies transfer condition: If is normal in and is a subgroup of , is normal in .
- Modular property of groups: If , then and .
- Join lemma for normal subgroup of subgroup with normal subgroup of whole group: If and is normal in , then the subgroup is normal in the subgroup .
- Second isomorphism theorem: If are subgroups of a group such that is normal in , then is isomorphic to .
Proof
Hands-on proof
Given: are subgroups of a group such that is a normal subgroup of and is a normal subgroup of .
To prove: is normal in and is normal in , and we have an isomorphism:
.
Proof:
- (Given data used: ; Fact used: fact (1)): is normal in : This follows from fact (1), setting .
- (Given data used: ): and normalize : Since is normal in , the normalizer of contains , hence it also contains .
- and are subgroups: This follows directly from step (2).
- is normal in : By step (2), is normal in , and by step (1), is normal in . Thus, by fact (3), we obtain that is normal in . (Here, we set ).
- (Facts used: fact (4)): Setting and , we observe that by step (4), is normal in , so applying fact (4) yields:
- .
- (Facts used: fact (2)): Applying fact (2) with yields . (Note that both are equal because of the fact that , being normal in , permutes with . We thus have:
- .
- is normal in , both are subgroups, and we have (by analogous reasoning to steps (1) - (6)):
- .
- The right sides for steps (6) and (7) are equal, hence the left sides are isomorphic, completing the proof.
Proof by application of the correspondence theorem
PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]