Normality is upper join-closed: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
property = normal subgroup| | property = normal subgroup| | ||
metaproperty = upper join-closed subgroup property}} | metaproperty = upper join-closed subgroup property}} | ||
[[Difficulty level::1| ]] | |||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* [[Characteristicity is not upper join-closed]] | * [[Characteristicity is not upper join-closed]] | ||
* [[Conjugacy-closedness is not upper join-closed]] | * [[Conjugacy-closedness is not upper join-closed]] | ||
* [[Subnormality is not finite-upper join-closed]], [[subnormality is not permuting upper join-closed]] | |||
* [[2-subnormality is not finite-upper join-closed]], [[2-subnormality is not permuting upper join-closed]] | |||
===Analogues in other algebraic structures=== | ===Analogues and breakdowns of analogues in other algebraic structures=== | ||
* [[Ideal property is upper join-closed for Lie rings]]: If <math>I</math> is a subring of a Lie ring <math>L</math> such that <math>I</math> is an ideal in two subrings <math>A_j\le L</math>, where <math>j \in J</math>, an indexing set, then <math>I</math> is also an ideal in the Lie subring generated by all the <math>A_j</math>s. | |||
* [[Ideal property is not upper join-closed for alternating rings]] | |||
* [[Normality is not upper join-closed for algebra loops]] | |||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
Latest revision as of 06:49, 30 July 2013
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., normal subgroup) satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., upper join-closed subgroup property)
View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about normal subgroup |Get facts that use property satisfaction of normal subgroup | Get facts that use property satisfaction of normal subgroup|Get more facts about upper join-closed subgroup property
Statement
Statement with symbols
Suppose is a subgroup of , is a nonempty indexing set, and are subgroups of containing , such that (i.e., is a normal subgroup of ) for each . Then, is normal in the join of the s.
Related facts
Related facts about normality
- Join lemma for normal subgroup of subgroup with normal subgroup of whole group
- Normality is not UL-join-closed
- Normality is strongly join-closed
- Normality is strongly intersection-closed
- Normality is UL-intersection-closed
- Normality satisfies intermediate subgroup condition
- Normality satisfies transfer condition
Related facts about upper join-closedness
The fact about normality generalizes to the following:
Left-inner right-monoidal implies upper join-closed: A subgroup property that has a function restriction expression with the left property being inner automorphisms and the right property being monoidal (closed under composition) is upper join-closed.
Other manifestations of the general fact include:
Here are some related properties that are not upper join-closed:
- Characteristicity is not upper join-closed
- Conjugacy-closedness is not upper join-closed
- Subnormality is not finite-upper join-closed, subnormality is not permuting upper join-closed
- 2-subnormality is not finite-upper join-closed, 2-subnormality is not permuting upper join-closed
Analogues and breakdowns of analogues in other algebraic structures
- Ideal property is upper join-closed for Lie rings: If is a subring of a Lie ring such that is an ideal in two subrings , where , an indexing set, then is also an ideal in the Lie subring generated by all the s.
- Ideal property is not upper join-closed for alternating rings
- Normality is not upper join-closed for algebra loops
Proof
Given: A group , a subgroup , a nonempty indexing set , and a collection of subgroups , such that is normal in for each .
To prove: is normal in the join of the s.
Proof: Let be the join of the s. For , we can write:
where for some index element . Thus, if denotes conjugation by , we have:
Now, since is normal in , each acts as an automorphism of . Thus, their composite, namely , is also an automorphism of . In other words, for every , showing that is normal in .