Pronormal subgroup is normal subset-conjugacy-determined in normalizer
History
This theorem is attributed to Burnside.
Statement
Suppose is a Pronormal subgroup (?) of a Group (?) and be its normalizer in . Suppose are two normal subsets of : they are both invariant under the action of by conjugation. Then, if and are conjugate in , they are also conjugate in .
Note that the element of may not act on in precisely the same way as the element of . For the sharper result that the two elements act in the same way, we need to take both and to be inside the center of .
Related facts
- Center of pronormal subgroup is subset-conjugacy-determined in normalizer: The proof is the same, except that we use centralizers instead of normalizers, and obtain a sharper result stating that the element of the normalizer acts in exactly the same way as the element of the group.
- Abelian pronormal subgroup is subset-conjugacy-determined in normalizer
- Abelian and abnormal implies subset-conjugacy-closed
Proof
This proof uses the right action convention: .
Given: A pronormal subgroup of a group with normalizer . and are subsets of invariant under the action of by conjugation. There exists such that .
To prove: There exists such that . Note that the action of by conjugation on may not be precisely the same as the action of on .
Proof: Let denote the set of all such that . Define similarly. Then, . Since by assumption, we get . Thus, both and are subgroups of .
By the assumption that is pronormal in , we can find such that . In particular, .
Define . . Thus, . Further, , where the last step follows from the fact that .
Thus, satisfies the required conditions and we are done.
References
Textbook references
- Finite Groups by Daniel Gorenstein, ISBN 0821843427, More info, Page 240, Theorem 1.1, Section 7.1 (Local fusion)