Tour:Equivalence of definitions of group action

From Groupprops

This article adapts material from the main article: equivalence of definitions of group action

This page is part of the Groupprops guided tour for beginners (Jump to beginning of tour)
PREVIOUS: Understanding the definition of a homomorphism| UP: Introduction five (beginners)| NEXT: Cayley's theorem
General instructions for the tour | Pedagogical notes for the tour | Pedagogical notes for this part

In an earlier page of this tour, you saw one definition of group action. There are actually two definitions of group action: the one you saw and another one in terms of homomorphism to a symmetric group. This page gives both definitions and proves their equivalence.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO: Understand both definitions, and the proof of their equivalence.

The definitions we have to prove as equivalent

Definition as a map from a product

A group action of a group on a set is a map satisfying:

Here denotes the identity element.

Further, the group action is termed faithful or effective if for every non-identity element , there exists such that .

Definition as a homomorphism to a symmetric group

A group action of a group on a set is a homomorphism of groups (where denotes the symmetric group on ).

Further, the action is termed faithful or effective if is injective.

Proof of equivalence

The first definition implies the second

Suppose we are given a map satisfying the conditions:

and:

We now construct the map . For every , is defined as the map:

Clearly, is a function from to , and is the identity map (by the second assumption on . The fact that is in for every holds because:

Hence is a left inverse for , and a similar argument shows that it is a right inverse. Thus, is an invertible map from to , hence an element of .

Finally the fact that is a homomorphism follows from the first condition:

Further, suppose is faithful. Consider any two distinct elements of . Consider . Since are distinct, is a non-identity element, so by faithfulness, there exists such that . Using the definition of group action, we obtain that while . In particular, and are permutations that differ on , hence are not equal. Thus, distinct elements of map to distinct permutations, and is thus injective.

The second definition implies the first

Given a homomorphism , the map is given by:

Let us check that satisfies both the specified conditions:

The latter is because a homomorphism of groups takes the identity element to the identity element.

Further, if is injective, then for any non-identity element , , hence is not the identity permutation. Thus, there exists such that does not fix . Thus yields , as desired.

This page is part of the Groupprops guided tour for beginners (Jump to beginning of tour)
PREVIOUS: Understanding the definition of a homomorphism| UP: Introduction five (beginners)| NEXT: Cayley's theorem
General instructions for the tour | Pedagogical notes for the tour | Pedagogical notes for this part