Subnormal not implies conjugate-permutable

From Groupprops

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., subnormal subgroup) need not satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., conjugate-permutable subgroup)
View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications
Get more facts about subnormal subgroup|Get more facts about conjugate-permutable subgroup

EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property subnormal subgroup but not conjugate-permutable subgroup|View examples of subgroups satisfying property subnormal subgroup and conjugate-permutable subgroup

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The subgroup property of being a subnormal subgroup does not imply the subgroup property of being conjugate-permutable.

Verbal statement

It is possible to have a subnormal subgroup in a group that is not conjugate-permutable. In fact, it is possible to have a k-subnormal subgroup that is not conjugate-permutable for any k≥3.

Related facts

Proof

Example of the dihedral group

Consider a dihedral group of order 2n,n≥4. This is the semidirect product of a cyclic group of order 2n−1 and a cyclic group of order two, where the latter acts on the former by the inverse map. Here, the cyclic subgroup of order two is a (n−1)-subnormal subgroup. We claim that this subgroup is not conjugate-permutable for n≥4.

To see this, let us make the description of the dihedral group explicit:

D2n:=⟨a,x∣a2n−1=x2=e,xax−1=a−1⟩

We claim that the two-element subgroup {x,e} is not conjugate-permutable. Indeed, observe that:

axa−1=xa−2.

So the subgroup {xa−2,e} is a conjugate to the original subgroup. On the other hand, for these two subgroups to permute, we require that x commutes with a2, which is not true since:

xa2x−1=a−2≠a2

for n≥4.