Statement
Statement with the right-action convention
Suppose
is a group,
is a subgroup of
, and
is a subset of
. Then,
normalizes the following subgroup of
:
.
Here,
denotes the commutator of the two elements.
Note that since
, the subgroup
equals the subgroup
.
Statement with the left-action convention
Suppose
is a group,
is a subgroup of
, and
is a subset of
. Then,
normalizes the following subgroup of
:
.
Here,
denotes the commutator of the two elements.
Note that since
, the subgroup
equals the subgroup
.
Difference between the two statements
Note also that the subgroup
defined in the right-action convention is the subgroup
as per the left-action convention. However, the truth of the two statements is still equivalent since the quantification is over all subsets of
.
Related facts
Applications
Facts used
- Formula for commutator of element and product of two elements: With the right-action convention, this is expressed as:
.
where
. and
.
With the left-action convention, it is expressed as:
where
and
.
Proof
With the right-action convention
Given: A group
, a subgroup
, a subset
of
.
To prove:
normalizes
.
Proof: Since
(with
) form a generating set for
, it suffices to show that
for any
. Let's do this. By fact (1), we have:
.
This rearranges to give:
.
Note that since
,
. Thus, the right side is a left quotient of two elements in
, hence it is in
, completing the proof.
With the left-action convention
PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]
One of the people editing this page intended to fill in this information at a later stage, but hasn't gotten around to doing it yet. If you see this placeholder for a long time, file an error report at the
error reporting page.