Stability group of subnormal series of finite p-group is p-group
Statement
Let be a finite -group, i.e., a group of prime power order where the underlying prime is . Suppose there is a subnormal series:
Consider the subgroup of given as the group of stability automorphisms of this subnormal series, i.e., as follows:
Then is a -group.
Related facts
Converse
A converse of sorts is true for this statement (note that the converse actually establishes a normal series, and not just a subnormal series):
Generalizations
- Stability group of subnormal series of finite group has no other prime factors
- Left-stability group of subgroup series of finite group has no other prime factors
- Burnside's theorem on coprime automorphisms and Frattini subgroup: Uses a similar idea, but makes a weaker assumption on the automorphism: that it induce identity on the Frattini quotient.
- Omega-1 of odd-order p-group is coprime automorphism-faithful
Facts used
- Cauchy's theorem: This states that given a finite group, and a prime dividing the order of the group, there is an element of the finite group of order exactly .
Proof
Proof idea
By induction, the proof can be reduced to the case where we have a subnormal series of length two, and an automorphism that fixes both the normal subgroup and the quotient. Next, we iterate this automorphism by its order, and show that the order of the automorphism must equal the order of some element in the normal subgroup, which is hence a prime power.
Proof details
Given: is a finite -group, i.e., a group of prime power order where the underlying prime is . Suppose there is a subnormal series:
Consider the subgroup of given as the group of stability automorphisms of this subnormal series, i.e., as follows:
To prove: is also a -group
Proof: By fact (1), we know that if were not a -group, we can find elements in it whose order is equal to one of the other prime factors of .
Thus, it suffices to show the following: For any element such that has order , relatively prime to , to be the identity automorphism.
We prove the claim by induction on the order of .
is a stability automorphism for the subnormal series of . Truncating this series at , we get a subnormal series for , and gives a stability automorphism for that subnormal series as well. Applying the induction assumption to , gives a stability automorphism of order relatively prime to on , so must act as the identity on . Also, by our assumption, acts as the identity on the quotient .
Thus, we need to show that if acts as identity on and on , and has order relatively prime to , then is the identity automorphism.
Pick . Then, consider the element . Clearly, we can write for some , because preserves the cosets of . Further, since , we have, by induction, that for every positive integer :
In particular, we have:
But has order a power of , and is relatively prime to , forcing . So . This argument works for every , so every element is fixed by the action of so is the identity automorphism.
References
Textbook references
- Finite Groups by Daniel Gorenstein, ISBN 0821843427, More info, Page 178-179, Chapter 5, Theorems 3.2 and Corollary 3.3 (formal statement, with proof)
- Nilpotent groups and their automorphisms by Evgenii I. Khukhro, ISBN 3110136724, More info, Page 18, Theorem 1.6.3 (Section 1.6) (actually proves the somewhat more general formulation that Stability group of subnormal series of finite group has no other prime factors)