Normal equals retract-potentially characteristic
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term normal subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
The following are equivalent for a subgroup of a group :
- is a normal subgroup of .
- is a retract-potentially characteristic subgroup of in the following sense: there exists a group containing as a retract (i.e., has a normal complement in ) such that is a characteristic subgroup of .
Related facts
- Normal equals potentially characteristic
- Finite NPC theorem
- Finite NIPC theorem
- Fact about amalgam-characteristic subgroups: finite normal implies amalgam-characteristic, periodic normal implies amalgam-characteristic, central implies amalgam-characteristic
Facts used
- Characteristicity is centralizer-closed
- Characteristic implies normal
- Normality satisfies intermediate subgroup condition
Proof
Proof of (1) implies (2) (hard direction)
Given: A group , a normal subgroup of .
To prove: There exists a group containing as a retract such that is characteristic in .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Let be a simple non-abelian group that is not isomorphic to any subgroup of . | Note that such a group exists. For instance, we can take the finitary alternating group on any set of cardinality at least 5 and also strictly bigger than that of . | |||
| 2 | Let be the restricted wreath product of and , where acts via the regular action of and let be the restricted direct power . In other words, is the semidirect product of the restricted direct power and , acting via the regular group action of the quotient group (in particular, the restriction of the action to is trivial). | is normal in | Step (1) | Normality of is what allows us to say that the action passes to the quotient group as a regular group action. | |
| 3 | Any homomorphism from to is trivial. | Steps (1), (2) | By definition, is a restricted direct product of copies of . Since is simple and not isomorphic to any subgroup of , any homomorphism from to is trivial. Thus, any homomorphism from to is trivial. | ||
| 4 | is characteristic in . | Steps (2), (3) | Under any automorphism of , the image of is a homomorphic image of in . Its projection to is a homomorphic image of in , which is trivial by Step (3), so the image of in must be in . | ||
| 5 | The centralizer of in equals . | Steps (1), (2) | By definition of the wreath product action, centralizes . Since is centerless, is also centerless. Thus, contains but has trivial intersection with , forcing . | ||
| 6 | The centralizer of in equals . | Steps (2), (5) | Step (5) already shows that , so it suffices to show that . To see this, note that, by the construction in Step (2), any element of outside permutes the direct factors of as an element of outside . The permutation action is nontrivial, so the whole action is nontrivial, and hence elements outside cannot centralize . This forces , completing the proof. | ||
| 7 | is characteristic in . | Fact (1) | Steps (4), (6) | Step-fact combination direct | |
| 8 | is characteristic in and is a retract of . | Steps (2), (7) | Step-combination direct |
This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format
Proof of (2) implies (1) (easy direction)
Given: A group , a subgroup of , a group containing such that is characteristic in .
To prove: is normal in .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | is normal in . | Fact (2) | is characteristic in | Given-fact-combination direct | |
| 2 | is normal in . | Fact (3) | Step (1) | Given-step-fact combination direct |