# Projective representation

This term is related to: linear representation theory
View other terms related to linear representation theory | View facts related to linear representation theory

## Definition

Let $G$ be a group. A projective representation of $G$ over a field $k$ is defined in the following equivalent ways:

• It is a homomorphism from $G$ to the projective general linear group for a vector space over $k$
• It is (up to projective equivalence) a map $\alpha:G \to GL(V)$ (viz,to the general linear group) where the images of elements of $g$ are ambiguous upto scalar multiples, and such that $\alpha(gh) = \alpha(g)\alpha(h)$ upto a scalar multiple.

if we let $f: G \times G \to k^*$ be the function such that:

$\alpha(gh) = f(g,h)\alpha(g)\alpha(h)$

then we say that $\alpha$ is a $f$-representation.

Two projective representations $\alpha_1: G \to GL(V_1)$ and $\alpha_2:G \to GL(V_2)$ over a field $k$ are termed projectively equivalent if there exists a vector space isomorphism $F:V_1 \to V_2$ and a function (not necessarily a homomorphism) $\theta:G \to k^\times$ such that for every $g \in G$ and $v\in V$:

$F(\alpha_1(g) \cdot v) = \theta(g)(\alpha_2(g) \cdot F(v))$

In other words, they differ by a scalar multiplication combined with a change-of-basis isomorphism.

## Facts

### Linear representations give projective representations

Every linear representation $G \to GL(V)$ gives rise to a projective representation, $G \to PGL(V)$, simply by composing the given representation with the quotient map $GL(V) \to PGL(V)$ (which involves quotienting out by the center). However, not every projective representation arises from a linear representation.

However, it is very much possible that different linear representations descend to the same projective representation. The following is in fact true:

Two linear representations are projectively equivalent if and only if one of them can be obtained from the other via multiplication by a one-dimensional representation.

In particular, all the one-dimensional representations are projectively equivalent to each other.

### Projective representation gives a 2-cocycle

Let $\alpha$ be a projective representation. Then we can associate to it a 2-cocycle such that:

$\alpha(gh) = f(g,h)\alpha(g)\alpha(h)$

By the assumptions for a projective representation, this turns out to be a 2-cocycle from $G$ to $k^*$.

It turns out that projectively equivalent projective representations give 2-cocycles that differ multiplicatively by a 2-coboundary. Thus, any projective representation up to projective equivalence defines an element of the second cohomology group for trivial group action $H^2(G,k^\ast)$.

### When is a projective representation equivalent to a linear representation?

A projective representation is projectively equivalent to a linear representation iff the 2-cocycle associated to it is a 2-coboundary. In particular, this means that if $H^2(G,k^*)$ (the second cohomology group) is trivial, any projective representation is projectively equivalent to a linear representation.

When $k = \mathbb{C}$, this is the same as the assertion that the group has trivial Schur multiplier (or is Schur-trivial).

In general, any projective representation of the group gives rise to a linear representation of its Schur covering group.