Normalizer of isomorph-conjugate implies isomorph-dominating

From Groupprops

Statement

Suppose is a group and is an Isomorph-conjugate subgroup (?) of : any subgroup of isomorphic to is also conjugate to within . Then, the Normalizer (?) of in is isomorph-dominating in : if is isomorphic to , there exists such that .

Related facts

Corollaries

Note that the normalizer of an isomorph-conjugate subgroup in an infinite group is not necessarily isomorph-conjugate. For instance, consider the group of integers. The normalizer of the trivial subgroup is the whole group, which is not isomorph-conjugate: there are proper subgroups of the group of integers isomorphic to it.

Proof

(This proof uses the left-action convention).

Given: A group , an isomorph-conjugate subgroup of .

To prove: If is a subgroup such that , then there exists such that .

Proof: Let be an isomorphism. Then, and are isomorphic groups. Thus, there exists such that .

Since taking normalizer commutes with automorphisms, we get . Now, since is normal in , is normal in . In particular, is contained in the normalizer of , so .