Normalizer of isomorph-conjugate implies isomorph-dominating
Statement
Suppose is a group and is an Isomorph-conjugate subgroup (?) of : any subgroup of isomorphic to is also conjugate to within . Then, the Normalizer (?) of in is isomorph-dominating in : if is isomorphic to , there exists such that .
Related facts
Corollaries
- Isomorph-conjugacy is normalizer-closed in finite: In a finite group, any isomorph-dominating subgroup is also isomorph-conjugate, so the normalizer of any isomorph-conjugate subgroup is isomorph-conjugate.
Note that the normalizer of an isomorph-conjugate subgroup in an infinite group is not necessarily isomorph-conjugate. For instance, consider the group of integers. The normalizer of the trivial subgroup is the whole group, which is not isomorph-conjugate: there are proper subgroups of the group of integers isomorphic to it.
Proof
(This proof uses the left-action convention).
Given: A group , an isomorph-conjugate subgroup of .
To prove: If is a subgroup such that , then there exists such that .
Proof: Let be an isomorphism. Then, and are isomorphic groups. Thus, there exists such that .
Since taking normalizer commutes with automorphisms, we get . Now, since is normal in , is normal in . In particular, is contained in the normalizer of , so .