Nilpotent implies normalizer condition

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two group properties. That is, it states that every group satisfying the first group property must also satisfy the second group property
View all group property implications | View all group property non-implications
|

Property "Page" (as page type) with input value "{{{stronger}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Page" (as page type) with input value "{{{weaker}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.

Statement

Any Nilpotent group (?) satisfies the normalizer condition: it has no proper Self-normalizing subgroup (?).

Facts used

Proof

Proof using given facts

The proof follows directly from facts (1) and (2).

Direct proof

Given: A nilpotent group $G$ , a proper subgroup $H$ of $G$ . $N_{G}(H)$ denotes the normalizer of $H$ in $G$ .

To prove: $H$ is properly contained in $N_{G}(H)$

Proof: We prove this by induction on the nilpotency class of $G$ . For now, let us assume that the result has been proved for all groups of nilpotency class strictly less than that of $G$ . The base case of the induction is Abelian groups, where the statement is clearly true (because every subgroup is normal).

Let $Z(G)$ denote the center of $G$ . Clearly $Z(G)\leq N_{G}(H)$ . Consider two cases:

$Z(G)$ is not contained in $H$ : In this case, $H$ cannot be equal to $N_{G}(H)$
$Z(G)$ is contained in $H$ : In this case, consider the subgroup $H/Z(G)$ in the group $G/Z(G)$ . The nilpotency class of $G/Z(G)$ is one less than that of $G$ , and $H/Z(G)$ is a proper subgroup since $H$ is proper in $G$ . Hence, we have:

$H/Z(G)\neq N_{G/Z(G)}(H/Z(G))$

But the right side is the same as:

$(N_{G}(H))/(Z(G))$

showing that $H/Z(G)\neq N_{G}(H)/Z(G)$ . Thus, $H\neq N_{G}(H)$ .