Isoclinic groups have same nilpotency class

From Groupprops

Statement

Suppose and are Isoclinic groups (?). Then, the following are true:

  • is a nilpotent group if and only if is a nilpotent group.
  • If the groups are nilpotent and both nontrivial, then the nilpotency class of is the same as the nilpotency class of . Note that if one of the groups is trivial, the other may be nontrivial but must still be abelian, giving a situation where one group has class zero and the other has class one.

Related facts

Similar facts about same nilpotency class

Similar facts about isoclinic groups

Proof

This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format

Given: Isoclinic groups and .

To prove: is nilpotent if and only if is, and if so, they have the same nilpotency class if both are nontrivial. If either is trivial, the other may be nontrivial but must be abelian.

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Previous steps used
1 is nilpotent if and only if its inner automorphism group is nilpotent, and if so, the nilpotency class of is one more than the nilpotency class of its inner automorphism group (unless is trivial). definition of nilpotent group, via the upper central series. --
2 is nilpotent if and only if its inner automorphism group is nilpotent, and if so, the nilpotency class of is one more than the nilpotency class of its inner automorphism group (unless is trivial). definition of nilpotent group, via the upper central series. --
3 The inner automorphism group of is isomorphic to the inner automorphism group of . definition of isoclinism is isoclinic to .
4 is nilpotent if and only if is nilpotent, and they have the same nilpotency class unless one of them is trivial. Steps (1)-(3)
5 If either group is trivial, the inner automorphism group of both must be trivial, so both must be abelian. Step (3).

Steps (4) and (5) together complete the proof.