Image-closed fully invariant not implies verbal
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., image-closed fully invariant subgroup) need not satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., verbal subgroup)
View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications
Get more facts about image-closed fully invariant subgroup|Get more facts about verbal subgroup
EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property image-closed fully invariant subgroup but not verbal subgroup|View examples of subgroups satisfying property image-closed fully invariant subgroup and verbal subgroup
Statement
It is possible to have a group and a subgroup of such that:
- is an image-closed fully invariant subgroup of : for any surjective homomorphism , is a fully invariant subgroup of .
- is not a verbal subgroup of .
Facts used
Proof
Example of the quasicyclic group
For any prime , let be the quasicyclic group for the prime . This is defined as the inverse limit of the sequence:
It can also be defined as the group of all roots of unity for all .
Define as the subgroup comprising the elements of order . Then:
- Any nontrivial normal subgroup of contains . Thus, for any surjective homomorphism , either the map is an isomorphism or we have that is trivial. In either case, is fully invariant in .
- is not verbal in : A verbal subgroup of an abelian group is a power subgroup -- it is the set of powers for some . But in this group , the set of powers is equal to for all .