Finite not implies composition factor-unique

From Groupprops

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two group properties. That is, it states that every group satisfying the first group property (i.e., finite group) need not satisfy the second group property (i.e., composition factor-unique group)
View a complete list of group property non-implications | View a complete list of group property implications
Get more facts about finite group|Get more facts about composition factor-unique group

Statement

The order of the composition factors for different composition series of a finite group need not be the same. In other words, it is possible to have two composition series:

{e}=M0M1Mr=G

and

{e}=N0N1Nr=G.

such that there is some i for which Ni/Ni1 is not isomorphic to Mi/Mi1.

Proof

Example of a direct product of simple groups

Let G1,G2 be non-isomorphic simple groups. Then, the group G=G1×G2 has the two composition series:

M0={e}M1=G1×{e}M2=G1×G2

and:

N0={e}N1={e}×G2N2=G1×G2.

The quotients for the two series come in different orders: in the first series. For the first series, the quotient M1/M0 is G1 and the quotient M2/M1 is G2. For the second series, the quotient N1/N0 is G2 and the quotient N2/N1 is G1. Since G1 is not isomorphic to G2, the quotients do not occur in the same order.