This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term dicyclic group
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
Consider the group with presentation:
Then:
- The element
is in the center of
.
is the identity element of
.
- If we set
, and denote by
the identity element,
satisfies the relations
. Further, the presentation:
also defines
.
Facts used
- Group acts as automorphisms by conjugation
Proof
We use the notation as in the statement above.
| Step no. |
Assertion/construction |
Facts used |
Given data used |
Previous steps used |
Explanation
|
| 1 |
is central |
|
 |
|
Since every element commutes with its powers, all commute with . Since the group is generated by , the centralizer of is the whole group, so is central.
|
| 2 |
, so the group is generated by  |
|
 |
|
We cancel a from both sides.
|
| 3 |
 |
|
 |
Step (2) |
Combining and Step (2), we get , so .
|
| 4 |
 |
|
|
Step (3) |
Multiply both sides of Step (3) by on the left and on the right, then interchange the two sides.
|
| 5 |
, i.e.,  |
Fact (1) |
 |
Step (4) |
[SHOW MORE]Raise both sides of Step (4) to the  power and use Fact (1) to simplify  to  . The second interpretation follows from  .
|
| 6 |
, i.e.,  |
|
 |
|
[SHOW MORE]Since  ,  must commute with <amth>a^n</math>, so 
|
| 7 |
so is the identity |
|
|
Steps (6),(7) |
|
| 8 |
Setting , , we get  |
|
 |
Steps (4), (7) |
[SHOW MORE]By Step (7),  , and since  , we get  . Since  and it has order two, we also get  . Thus, we get  . The relation  follows from Step (4), setting  .
|
| 9 |
Conversely, the original relations can be deduced from by setting , , so the two presentations define the same group |
|
|
|
[SHOW MORE]Set  . The relation  gives  . So  . Thus, we get  . Since  we get  and rearranging (reversing Step (4) to Step (3)) gives  . This gives  . Set  and get  , so we get  .
|