This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term direct product
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
The definitions we have to prove as equivalent
Internal direct product
Suppose
is a group, and
are normal subgroups. We say that
is an internal direct product of
and
if
is trivial, and
.
External direct product
What we need to prove
Every internal direct product is naturally isomorphic to the external direct product
We need to prove that given a group
that is the internal direct product of normal subgroups
, we can identify
naturally with the external direct product
.
Proof: Consider the map:
We first must verify that
is a group homomorphism. For this, we first observe that if
, then:
Combining these, we get:
Hence, we get:
.
Thus, any element of
commutes with any element of
. Thus, if we pick two pairs
, then:
In the intermediate step, we use that
and
commute. Thus,
is a group homomorphism. It's clear that
preserves the identity element and inverses, too.
Next we note that:
is injective because
.
is surjective because by assumption,
.
Thus,
defines an isomorphism from
to
.
Every external direct product is naturally realized as an internal direct product
We need to show that if
and
are abstract groups, then we can find subgroups in
isomorphic to
and
respectively, whose internal direct product is
. Indeed:
- The subgroup isomorphic to
is
(i.e., elements of the form
).
- The subgroup isomorphic to
is
(i.e., elements of the form
).
Let's now check the conditions for an internal direct product:
- Both the subgroups are normal: This is a direct check using the coordinate-wise multiplication.
- The subgroups intersect only at
: This is set-theoretically obvious.
- The product of the subgroups is
: Any element
can be written as the product of
and
.