This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term weakly abnormal subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent
Here are two equivalent definitions of weakly abnormal for a subgroup
of a group
:
- For any
, let
be the closure in
of
under the action by conjugation of the cyclic group generated by
. Then,
.
- If
, then
is a Self-normalizing subgroup (?) of
.
- If
, then
is a Contranormal subgroup (?) of
.
Proof
(1) implies (2)
Given:
such that
for all
.
.
To prove:
.
Proof: Suppose
. Then,
, so
. In particular,
, so
. Thus,
.
is tautological, so
.
(2) implies (1)
Given:
such that, for any intermediate subgroup
,
.
To prove:
for any
.
Proof: Let
. Then, by definition of
, both
and
map
to within itself, so conjugation by
gives an automorphism of
. Thus,
. By assumption,
, so
, yielding
, as desired.
(2) implies (3)
Given: A subgroup
of
with the property that
for every subgroup
of
containing
.
To prove: If
,
is contranormal in
.
Proof: Let
be the normal closure of
in
. Since
is normal in
,
. Since
,
, so
, forcing
. Thus,
is contranormal in
.
(3) implies (2)
Given: A subgroup
of
with the property that if
,
is contranormal in
.
To prove:
for any subgroup
of
containing
.
Proof: Let
. Then
. By assumption,
is contranormal in
, and
is normal in
, forcing
. Thus, we get
.