Equivalence of definitions of weakly abnormal subgroup

From Groupprops

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term weakly abnormal subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent

Here are two equivalent definitions of weakly abnormal for a subgroup of a group :

  1. For any , let be the closure in of under the action by conjugation of the cyclic group generated by . Then, .
  2. If , then is a Self-normalizing subgroup (?) of .
  3. If , then is a Contranormal subgroup (?) of .

Proof

(1) implies (2)

Given: such that for all . .

To prove: .

Proof: Suppose . Then, , so . In particular, , so . Thus, . is tautological, so .

(2) implies (1)

Given: such that, for any intermediate subgroup , .

To prove: for any .

Proof: Let . Then, by definition of , both and map to within itself, so conjugation by gives an automorphism of . Thus, . By assumption, , so , yielding , as desired.

(2) implies (3)

Given: A subgroup of with the property that for every subgroup of containing .

To prove: If , is contranormal in .

Proof: Let be the normal closure of in . Since is normal in , . Since , , so , forcing . Thus, is contranormal in .

(3) implies (2)

Given: A subgroup of with the property that if , is contranormal in .

To prove: for any subgroup of containing .

Proof: Let . Then . By assumption, is contranormal in , and is normal in , forcing . Thus, we get .