Equivalence of definitions of intermediately subnormal-to-normal subgroup
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term intermediately subnormal-to-normal subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent
The following are equivalent for a subgroup of a group :
- For any intermediate subgroup such that is a subnormal subgroup of , is actually a normal subgroup of .
- For any intermediate subgroup such that is a 2-subnormal subgroup of , is actually a normal subgroup of .
- For any intermediate subgroup , .
Facts used
- Normalizer of intermediately subnormal-to-normal implies self-normalizing
- Normality is strongly join-closed
- Normality satisfies inverse image condition
Proof
(1) implies (2)
This is obvious, since any 2-subnormal subgroup is also subnormal.
(2) implies (1)
Given: A group . A subgroup that is normal in any intermediate subgroup in which it is 2-subnormal.
To prove: is normal in any intermediate subgroup in which it is normal.
Proof: We prove this by induction on the subnormal depth of , showing that if has subnormal depth in it has subnormal depth , for . Indeed, suppose has subnormal depth . We have a subnormal series:
.
Then, is 2-subnormal in , hence is normal in by assumption. Thus, we hav ea subnormal series of length :
.
This completes the induction.
(2) implies (3)
This follows from fact (1). Note that fact (1) only states that the normalizer in the whole group is self-normalizing, but since the property of being intermediately subnormal-to-normal is preserved on looking at intermediate subgroups, the normalizer in any intermediate subgroup is self-normalizing.
(3) implies (2)
Given: A group , a subgroup such that for any intermediate subgroup . is 2-subnormal in some intermediate subgroup
To prove: is also normal in .
Proof: Let . We prove that , by deriving a contradiction from the assumption that .
- Let be the join of all normal subgroups of containing and contained in . Note that the set is nonempty, since is -subnormal in . By fact (2), is itself normal in .
- Suppose . Let . Then, define and . Then,
- .
- Also, is a subgroup of the cyclic group , and is hence normal in . Thus, by fact (3), is normal in . Thus, .
- Thus, , while . Since by construction, is not contained in , we obtain that , and we have a contradiction.