Equivalence of definitions of intermediately subnormal-to-normal subgroup

From Groupprops

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term intermediately subnormal-to-normal subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent

The following are equivalent for a subgroup of a group :

  1. For any intermediate subgroup such that is a subnormal subgroup of , is actually a normal subgroup of .
  2. For any intermediate subgroup such that is a 2-subnormal subgroup of , is actually a normal subgroup of .
  3. For any intermediate subgroup , .

Facts used

  1. Normalizer of intermediately subnormal-to-normal implies self-normalizing
  2. Normality is strongly join-closed
  3. Normality satisfies inverse image condition

Proof

(1) implies (2)

This is obvious, since any 2-subnormal subgroup is also subnormal.

(2) implies (1)

Given: A group . A subgroup that is normal in any intermediate subgroup in which it is 2-subnormal.

To prove: is normal in any intermediate subgroup in which it is normal.

Proof: We prove this by induction on the subnormal depth of , showing that if has subnormal depth in it has subnormal depth , for . Indeed, suppose has subnormal depth . We have a subnormal series:

.

Then, is 2-subnormal in , hence is normal in by assumption. Thus, we hav ea subnormal series of length :

.

This completes the induction.

(2) implies (3)

This follows from fact (1). Note that fact (1) only states that the normalizer in the whole group is self-normalizing, but since the property of being intermediately subnormal-to-normal is preserved on looking at intermediate subgroups, the normalizer in any intermediate subgroup is self-normalizing.

(3) implies (2)

Given: A group , a subgroup such that for any intermediate subgroup . is 2-subnormal in some intermediate subgroup

To prove: is also normal in .

Proof: Let . We prove that , by deriving a contradiction from the assumption that .

  1. Let be the join of all normal subgroups of containing and contained in . Note that the set is nonempty, since is -subnormal in . By fact (2), is itself normal in .
  2. Suppose . Let . Then, define and . Then,
    1. .
    2. Also, is a subgroup of the cyclic group , and is hence normal in . Thus, by fact (3), is normal in . Thus, .
    3. Thus, , while . Since by construction, is not contained in , we obtain that , and we have a contradiction.