This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term homomorphism of groups
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
The definitions that we have to prove are equivalent
Textbook definition (with symbols)
Let
and
be groups. Then a map
is termed a homomorphism of groups if
satisfies the following condition:
for all
in
Universal algebraic definition (with symbols)
Let
and
be groups. Then a map
is termed a homomorphism of groups if
satisfies all the following conditions:
for all
in 


Related facts
Facts used
- Invertible implies cancellative in monoid
- Equality of left and right inverses in monoid
Proof
We need to prove that the condition:
for all
implies the other two conditions.
For clarity of the proofs, we denote the identity element of
by
and the identity element of
by
.
Proof that it preserves the identity element
Given: Groups
, a map
such that
for all
To prove:
Proof: Pick any
(we could pick
if we wanted). We get:
On the other hand, we have:
Combining, we get:
Cancel
from both sides using Fact (1) (note that
is a group, so Fact (1) applies to all elements) and get:
Proof that it preserves inverses
We will build on the result of the previous proof, that has already shown that the map must preserve the identity element.
Given: Groups
, a map
such that
for all
and
.
To prove: For any
,
Proof: By definition, we know that:
Applying
to both sides, we get that:
We know that
, so we get:
We can also write:
Equating the right sides and cancelling
, we get: