Equivalence of conjugacy and coset definitions of normality
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term normal subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term normalizer
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
The following are equivalent for a subgroup of a group and an element :
- . Here, is the conjugate subgroup of by .
- . Here, is the Left coset (?) of for the subgroup and is the right coset of for the subgroup .
The set of such that the equivalent conditions (1) and (2) hold is termed the Normalizer (?) of in . is a Normal subgroup (?) of if the above two conditions hold for all .
The techniques used in this proof
For a survey article describing these techniques in more detail, see manipulating equations in groups.
Proof
(1) implies (2)
Given: a subgroup of , , and .
To prove: .
Proof: Informally, we start with:
and multiply both on the right by . We get:
which simplifies to:
.
A clearer justification of the manipulation done on the left side can be obtained by looking at things elementwise. We have . Thus, .
(2) implies (1)
Given: a subgroup of , , and .
To prove: .
Prof: We start with:
We multiply both sides on the right by , and obtain:
which simplifies to:
.
A clearer justification of the manipulation done on the right side can be obtained by looking at things elementwise. We have and .