Congruence condition on number of elementary abelian subgroups of prime-cube and prime-fourth order for odd prime

From Groupprops

This article defines a replacement theorem
View a complete list of replacement theorems| View a complete list of failures of replacement

This article is about a congruence condition.
View other congruence conditions

Statement

In terms of a universal congruence condition

Suppose is an odd prime and or . Then, the singleton set comprising the elementary abelian group of order is a Collection of groups satisfying a universal congruence condition (?) for the prime .

Hands-on statement

Let be an odd prime and or . Then, if is a finite -group, the number of elementary abelian subgroups of of order is either equal to zero or congruent to modulo .

Related facts

Facts used

  1. Jonah-Konvisser lemma for elementary abelian-to-normal replacement for prime-cube and prime-fourth order: This states that if are two distinct elementary abelian normal subgroups of , and satisfies or , then any maximal subgroup of containing contains an elementary abelian subgroup of order .
  2. Support of good lines corollary to line lemma, Jonah-Konvisser line lemma

Proof

Preliminary lemma

Given: odd, or , and are normal subgroups of a finite -group both of order . .

To prove: has order at most or has order at most .

Proof: Since and both and are abelian and normal, . We consider the cases:

  1. has order at most : In this case, has order at most .
  2. has order : In this case, has order , so has order .

Main proof

We prove the statement by induction on the order of the finite -group. Here or .

Given: A finite -group containing an elementary abelian subgroup of order .

To prove: The number of elementary abelian subgroups of of order is congruent to modulo .

Proof: If itself has order , the number of such subgroups is . Thus, we assume that the order of is greater than .

  1. There is a maximal subgroup of containing the elementary abelian subgroup: This follows because the elementary abelian subgroup is proper.
  2. There is an elementary abelian subgroup of of order (in fact, ): This follows from the various equivalent formulations of universal congruence condition for . Explicitly, the number of elementary abelian subgroups of order in is congruent to modulo . The action of on these subgroups by conjugation has orbits of size or multiples of , so there is at least one orbit of size , and this gives a normal subgroup.
  3. Any pair of distinct elementary abelian normal subgroups supports good lines for the collection of elementary abelian subgroups of order . In other words, if are distinct elementary abelian normal subgroups of order , any maximal subgroup containing contains an elementary abelian subgroup of order :
    1. If , then either or : This is the lemma proved above.
    2. Any maximal subgroup of containing contains an elementary abelian subgroup of order : This follows from the previous step and fact (1).
    3. Any maximal subgroup of containing contains an elementary abelian subgroup of order . In other words, the pair supports good lines: This follows from the previous step and the fact that any maximal subgroup of contains a maximal subgroup of .
  4. The result now follows from fact (2).

References