Congruence condition on number of elementary abelian subgroups of prime-square order for odd prime

From Groupprops

This article states and (possibly) proves a fact that is true for odd-order p-groups: groups of prime power order where the underlying prime is odd. The statement is false, in general, for groups whose order is a power of two.
View other such facts for p-groups|View other such facts for finite groups

This article defines a replacement theorem
View a complete list of replacement theorems| View a complete list of failures of replacement

This article is about a congruence condition.
View other congruence conditions

Statement

Hands-on statement

Suppose is an odd prime and is a finite -group. Suppose has an elementary abelian subgroup of order . Then, the following are true:

  1. The number of elementary abelian subgroups of of order is congruent to modulo .
  2. The number of elementary abelian normal subgroups of of order is congruent to modulo . In particular, there is an elementary abelian normal subgroup of order .
  3. If is a normal subgroup of a bigger finite -group and contains an elementary abelian subgroup of order , then the number of elementary abelian subgroups of that are normal in is congruent to modulo . In particular, there is an elementary abelian subgroup of that is normal in .

Statement in terms of a universal congruence condition

Let be an odd prime.

Let be a singleton set comprising the elementary abelian subgroup of order .

Then, is a Collection of groups satisfying a universal congruence condition (?) for the prime .

Related facts

Breakdown at the prime two

Similar replacement theorems

Facts used

  1. Prime power order implies nilpotent, Nilpotent implies every maximal subgroup is normal
  2. Local origin corollary to line lemma
  3. Maximal subgroup of join of two elementary abelian normal subgroups of prime-square order contains elementary abelian subgroup of prime-square order for odd prime

Proof

We prove here the stronger version.

Equivalence of conditions (1)-(3)

For the equivalence of (1) and (2), consider the action of on itself by conjugation. Under this action, the non-normal elementary abelian subgroups of order form orbits whose size is a multiple of . Thus, the number of elementary abelian subgroups of order is congruent modulo to the number of elementary abelian normal subgroups of order .

For the equivalence of definitions (1) and (3), consider the action of on by conjugation. The subgroups of that are not normal in have orbits whose sizes are multiples of , so the number of elementary abelian subgroups of order in is congruent modulo to the number of such subgroups that are normal in . In particular, (1) implies (3). (3) clearly implies (2), and (2) is equivalent to (1).

We will freely use this equivalence in the proof below.

Main proof

Given: A -group (odd ). has an elementary abelian subgroup of order .

To prove: The number of elementary abelian subgroups of of order is modulo .

Proof: We prove the claim by induction on , assuming the result is true for smaller orders.

If , the number of subgroups is , and we are done. We consider the other case:

  1. There exists a maximal subgroup of containing : This follows since is proper.
  2. is normal in : This follows from fact (1).
  3. contains an elementary abelian normal subgroup of order (in fact, ): We apply the induction hypothesis in form (3) with in place of and in place of .
  4. If contains only one elementary abelian normal subgroup of order , we've proved the statement for in form (2). So, we assume that contains two distinct elementary abelian normal subgroups .
  5. Consider the product . This is either elementary abelian of order , or is isomorphic to prime-cube order group:U(3,p), i.e., is a non-abelian group of order and exponent . In either case, every maximal subgroup of it contains an elementary abelian subgroup of order (for more details, see fact (3)). In particular, the intersection of with any maximal subgroup of contains an elementary abelian group of order .
  6. Thus, is a local origin in the terminology of fact (2), and the induction hypothesis yields that the number of elementary abelian subgroups of order in is congruent to modulo .

References

Journal references