Divisibility-closed not implies local divisibility-closed
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., divisibility-closed subgroup) need not satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., local divisibility-closed subgroup)
View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications
Get more facts about divisibility-closed subgroup|Get more facts about local divisibility-closed subgroup
EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property divisibility-closed subgroup but not local divisibility-closed subgroup|View examples of subgroups satisfying property divisibility-closed subgroup and local divisibility-closed subgroup
Statement
It is possible to have a group and a subgroup satisfying the following:
- is a divisibility-closed subgroup of : If is a natural number such that every element of has a root in , then every element of has a root in .
- is not a local divisibility-closed subgroup of : There exists a natural number and an element such that has solutions for but no solution for .
Related facts
- Derived subgroup not is local divisibility-closed in nilpotent group whereas derived subgroup is divisibility-closed in nilpotent group
Proof
We can take any example of a subgroup of finite group where the subgroup is not local divisibility-closed. Some simple examples are below:
- Z2 in Z4: Let be cyclic group:Z4 and be Z2 in Z4, the unique cyclic subgroup of order two. The non-identity element of has square roots in but not in , so is not local divisibility-closed. However, being a subgroup of a finite group, it is divisibility-closed.
- Center of dihedral group:D8
- Center of quaternion group