Complemented normal not implies local powering-invariant

From Groupprops

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., complemented normal subgroup) need not satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., local powering-invariant subgroup)
View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications
Get more facts about complemented normal subgroup|Get more facts about local powering-invariant subgroup

EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property complemented normal subgroup but not local powering-invariant subgroup|View examples of subgroups satisfying property complemented normal subgroup and local powering-invariant subgroup

Statement

It is possible to have a group G and a complemented normal subgroup H of G such that H is not a local powering-invariant subgroup of G, i.e., there exists an element hH and a natural number n such that there is a unique solution uG to un=h, but uH.

Related facts

Opposite facts

Proof

Let G be the infinite dihedral group:

G:=a,xx2=e,xax=a1.

Here, e denotes the identity element.

Let H be the subgroup a2,x.

Then the following are true:

  • H is a complemented normal subgroup of G. It is normal because it is a subgroup of index two and it has a permutable complement ax of order two.
  • H is not local powering-invariant in G. For the element h=a2 and n=2, the only solution to u2=h for uG is u=a, and aH.