Classification of nilpotency-forcing numbers

From Groupprops

Statement

The following are equivalent for a natural number :

  1. Every group of order is a nilpotent group (and in particular, a finite nilpotent group)
  2. has prime factorization of the form where does not divide for any and .

The result is sometimes also called Schmidt's theorem. It is a corollary of the Schmidt-Iwasawa theorem.

Related facts

Facts used

  1. Lagrange's theorem
  2. Schmidt-Iwasawa theorem: This states that any group all of whose proper subgroups are nilpotent must be solvable; in particular, it must have a nilpotent maximal normal subgroup such that the quotient group is of prime order.
  3. Equivalence of definitions of finite nilpotent group
  4. Characteristic of normal implies normal

Proof

(1) implies (2)

It suffices to prove the contrapositive. In other words, we show that if the condition in (2) is violated, then we can construct a non-nilpotent group of that order.

Given: A natural number , distinct primes and a natural number such that divides , and divides .

To prove: There is a non-nilpotent group of order

Proof: Note that the product divides .

We can construct a non-nilpotent group of order as follows: consider the additive group of the field of size . The multiplicative group of this field is a cyclic group of size . Since divides , it has a subgroup of order . Construct a semidirect product of the additive group of order with this subgroup of order .

We can now construct a non-nilpotent group of order as the external direct product:

(2) implies (1)

We prove the claim by induction on the number. Note that any divisor of a number that satisfies the condition also satisfies the condition.

Base case for induction (): Obvious

Inductive step: The inductive hypothesis is that the result holds for all smaller numbers.

Given: A natural number has prime factorization of the form where does not divide for any and . is a group of order .

To prove: is nilpotent

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Give data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Every proper subgroup of is nilpotent Fact (1) inductive hypothesis
arithmetic condition on
Any divisor of satisfies the conditions necessary for the inductive hypothesis to apply. Applying the inductive hypothesis, we obtain that every subgroup is nilpotent.
2 Either is nilpotent or it contains a nilpotent maximal normal subgroup such that the quotient group is cyclic of prime order for some dividing Fact (2) Step (1) Step-fact combination direct
3 has a nilpotent normal -complement . Facts (3), (4) Step (2) has a nilpotent normal subgroup of index . This in turn has normal Sylow subgroups for all primes dividing its order, which are characteristic in it and therefore also normal in . For all primes other than , order considerations make these Sylow subgroups of as well.
4 Suppose is a -Sylow subgroup of . Then, every element of centralizes all elements of . Thus, is an internal direct product of and , and is nilpotent. does not divide for Step (3) [SHOW MORE]