Statement
Suppose
is a Non-associative ring (?) (i.e., a not necessarily associative ring -- this includes the associative ring, Lie ring, and other cases) and
is a derivation of
. For any nonnegative integer
, if we denote by
the composition of
with itself
times, with
defined as the identity map.
We then have:
Note that this in particular applies to the case of a Derivation of a Lie ring (?) and a Derivation of an associative ring (?).
Related facts
Applications
Proof
Proof idea
The idea is to use the Leibniz rule (which establishes the case
;
is vacuous) and prove by induction. The proof is almost exactly like the proof of the binomial formula for
for a commutative associative algebra.
Proof details: case 
In the case
, both sides are
, so the equality holds vacuously.
Proof details: case 
In this case, the left side is
. The right side is:
By the Leibniz rule, the left side equals the right side.
Proof details: inductive step
Inductive hypothesis:
To prove:
Proof: We have by definition:
By the inductive hypothesis, we can expand the inside and we get:
Since
is additive, we can pull it inside the summation on the right side and get:
Now using the Leibniz rule on the inside, we get:
We now rearrange the summation and obtain:
We use Pascal's identity on the sum of binomial coefficients and obtain what we want:
References