Base of a wreath product implies subset-conjugacy-closed
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., base of a wreath product) must also satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., subset-conjugacy-closed subgroup)
View all subgroup property implications | View all subgroup property non-implications
Get more facts about base of a wreath product|Get more facts about subset-conjugacy-closed subgroup
Statement
Statement with symbols
Suppose is the internal wreath product of subgroups and . In other words, is the base of a wreath product in . Then, is a subset-conjugacy-closed subgroup of : if are subsets of and there is a such that , then there exists a such that for all .
Definitions used
Base of a wreath product
Further information: Wreath product, Internal wreath product, base of a wreath product
Subset-conjugacy-closed subgroup
Further information: Subset-conjugacy-closed subgroup
Related facts
Other facts about subset-conjugacy-closed
- Direct factor implies subset-conjugacy-closed
- Retract implies subset-conjugacy-closed
- Central factor implies subset-conjugacy-closed
- Base of a wreath product satisfies intermediate subgroup condition
- Base of a wreath product implies conjugacy-closed
- Base of a wreath product implies 2-subnormal
- Base of a wreath product implies right-transitively 2-subnormal
Proof
Given: A group that is the internal wreath product of subgroups and .
To prove: If for subsets and , then there exists such that for all .
Proof: The statement is trivial if contain no non-identity element, so we assume without loss of generality that contains a non-identity element.
We have . Let be the subgroup . Then, , and the subgroup we are studying is the first direct factor of .
- We can write , where and , with .
- If , , and denote conjugation by respectively, then math>c_g = c_k \circ c_l</math>.
- The restriction of to is equal to conjugation by . Thus, restricted to , we have .
- permutes the direct factors of . But we know that sends at least one non-identity element of to within . This forces the action of on the direct factors of to preserve the first direct factor; equivalently, the permutation induced by fixes the first element.
- Thus, restricted to , is trivial and we get for the whole of . In particular, when restricted to the subset .