Divisibility-closed not implies local divisibility-closed

From Groupprops
Revision as of 17:45, 15 February 2013 by Vipul (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., divisibility-closed subgroup) need not satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., local divisibility-closed subgroup)
View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications
Get more facts about divisibility-closed subgroup|Get more facts about local divisibility-closed subgroup

EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property divisibility-closed subgroup but not local divisibility-closed subgroup|View examples of subgroups satisfying property divisibility-closed subgroup and local divisibility-closed subgroup

Statement

It is possible to have a group G and a subgroup H satisfying the following:

  1. H is a divisibility-closed subgroup of G: If n is a natural number such that every element of G has a nth root in G, then every element of H has a nth root in H.
  2. H is not a local divisibility-closed subgroup of G: There exists a natural number n and an element gH such that xn=g has solutions for xG but no solution for xH.

Related facts

Proof

We can take any example of a subgroup of finite group where the subgroup is not local divisibility-closed. Some simple examples are below: