Derived subgroup not is purely definable

From Groupprops
Revision as of 03:32, 7 January 2010 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{sdf subgroup property dissatisfaction| sdf = commutator subgroup| property = purely definable subgroup}} ==History== This is based on as yet unpublished result of Bestvina an…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of the fact that for a group, the subgroup obtained by applying a given subgroup-defining function (i.e., commutator subgroup) does not always satisfy a particular subgroup property (i.e., purely definable subgroup)
View subgroup property satisfactions for subgroup-defining functions

|

View subgroup property dissatisfactions for subgroup-defining functions

History

This is based on as yet unpublished result of Bestvina and Feighn (referred to here.

Statement

The commutator subgroup of a group need not be a purely definable subgroup.

More specifically, the commutator subgroup of the free group of rank two is not a purely definable subgroup.

Related facts