Finite-extensible implies class-preserving

From Groupprops
Revision as of 19:20, 30 May 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (→‎Statement)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two automorphism properties. That is, it states that every automorphism satisfying the first automorphism property (i.e., finite-extensible automorphism) must also satisfy the second automorphism property (i.e., class-preserving automorphism)
View all automorphism property implications | View all automorphism property non-implications
Get more facts about finite-extensible automorphism|Get more facts about class-preserving automorphism

This fact is related to: Extensible automorphisms problem
View other facts related to Extensible automorphisms problem | View terms related to Extensible automorphisms problem

Statement

Any finite-extensible automorphism of a finite group is a class-preserving automorphism.

Related facts

Other results towards the associated conjecture/problem

Further information: Extensible automorphisms problem, extensible automorphisms conjecture, finite-extensible implies inner

Other facts about finite groups proved using the same method

Facts about infinite groups proved using similar constructions


Facts used

  1. Finite-extensible implies semidirectly extensible for representation over finite field of coprime characteristic
  2. Semidirectly extensible implies linearly pushforwardable for representation over prime field
  3. Linearly pushforwardable implies class-preserving for class-separating field
  4. Every finite group admits a sufficiently large finite prime field
  5. Sufficiently large implies splitting, splitting implies character-separating, character-separating implies class-separating

Proof

Facts (1) and (2) combine to yield that any finite-extensible automorphism is linearly pushforwardable over a (finite) prime field where the prime does not divide the order of the group, and fact (3) yields that if the field chosen is a class-separating field for the group, then the automorphism is class-preserving. Thus, we need to show that for every finite group, there exists a prime field with the prime not dividing the order of the group, such that the field is a class-separating field for the group. This is achieved by facts (4) and (5).