Monolith is characteristic

From Groupprops
Revision as of 19:42, 30 August 2008 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (New page: {{subgroup property implication| stronger = monolith| weaker = strictly characteristic subgroup}} ==Statement== ===Verbal statement=== If a group has a monolith (a [[fact about:...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., monolith) must also satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., strictly characteristic subgroup)
View all subgroup property implications | View all subgroup property non-implications
Get more facts about monolith|Get more facts about strictly characteristic subgroup

Statement

Verbal statement

If a group has a monolith (a Minimal normal subgroup (?) contained in every nontrivial normal subgroup), then that monolith is a characteristic subgroup (it is invariant under any automorphism of the group).

Related facts

Stronger facts

Applications

Facts used

  1. Normality satisfies inverse image condition

Proof

Given: A group G, a minimal normal subgroup N such that NM for any nontrivial normal subgroup M. An automorphism σ of G.

To prove: σ(N)N.

Proof: Consider the subgroup σ1(N). This is normal by fact (1), either σ1(N) is trivial or Nσ1(N). Since σ is surjective and N is nontrivial, σ1(N) cannot be trivial. Thus, Nσ1(N). This forces that σ(N)N, as desired.