Sylow subgroups exist: Difference between revisions
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [[Sylow implies order-conjugate]]: All <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups are conjugate. This follows directly from the previous part. | * [[Sylow implies order-conjugate]]: All <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups are conjugate. This follows directly from the previous part. | ||
* [[Congruence condition on Sylow numbers]]: The number of <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups is congruent to <math>1</math> modulo <math>p</math>. | * [[Congruence condition on Sylow numbers]]: The number of <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups is congruent to <math>1</math> modulo <math>p</math>. | ||
===Stronger forms of existence=== | |||
* [[Every Sylow subgroup intersects the center nontrivially or is contained in a centralizer]]: Every Sylow subgroup of a group either has a nontrivial intersection with the [[center]] of the group, or it is contained in the centralizer of some non-central element. | |||
===Analogues for Hall subgroups=== | ===Analogues for Hall subgroups=== | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 13 December 2008
Statement
Let be a finite group and be a prime number. Then, there exists a -Sylow subgroup of : a subgroup whose order is a power of and whose index is relatively prime to .
Note that when does not divide the order of , the -Sylow subgroup is trivial, so the statement gives interesting information only when divides the order of . This statement is often viewed as a part of a more general statement called Sylow's theorem.
Related facts
Other parts of Sylow's theorem
- Sylow implies order-dominating: Given any -Sylow subgroup and any -subgroup, the -Sylow subgroup contains a conjugate of the -subgroup.
- Sylow implies order-conjugate: All -Sylow subgroups are conjugate. This follows directly from the previous part.
- Congruence condition on Sylow numbers: The number of -Sylow subgroups is congruent to modulo .
Stronger forms of existence
- Every Sylow subgroup intersects the center nontrivially or is contained in a centralizer: Every Sylow subgroup of a group either has a nontrivial intersection with the center of the group, or it is contained in the centralizer of some non-central element.
Analogues for Hall subgroups
The analogous statement does not hold for Hall subgroups. A Hall subgroup is a subgroup whose order and index are relatively prime. A -Hall subgroup is a Hall subgroup such that the set of primes dividing its order is contained in , and the set of primes dividing its index is disjoint from .
- Hall subgroups need not exist: Given a set of primes, there may not exist a -Hall subgroup.
- Hall subgroups exist in finite solvable: If, however, the finite group is solvable, then it has -Hall subgroups for all prime sets .
- Hall's theorem on solvability: This states that a finite group is solvable if and only if it has -Hall subgroups for every prime set .
Proof
Proof by action on subsets
Let be the order of . Let be the higher power of that divides the order of . Clearly, a subgroup of is a -Sylow subgroup if and only if it has order . If we denote by , then the index of any -Sylow subgroup must be .
Consider the action of by left multiplication on the set of subsets of of size . Here are some observations regarding this action:
- The size of the set on which acts is the number of subsets of size in . This is a binomial coefficient, and an appeal to Lucas' theorem reveals that its value is relatively prime to .
- Since the total cardinality of the set is relatively prime to , there must exist at least one orbit under the action of which has size relatively prime to . Let be the isotropy subgroup for a point in this orbit.
- Now, since the size of the orbit is relatively prime to , the index of is relatively prime to , and hence a divisor of .
- On the other hand, given any subset of size , we know that the translates of cover the whole of , and therefore there are at least members in the orbit of .
- Combining these two facts must have index exactly -- hence it is a subgroup.
Interestingly, the only nontrivial result we use here (Lucas' theorem) can itself be proved using group theory (although a purely algebraic proof also exists).
Proof by conjugation action
PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]