Maschke's averaging lemma for abelian groups: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>G</math> is a finite group, whose order is relatively prime to a prime <math>p</math>. Suppose <math>V</math> is an Abelian <math>p</math>-group, and we ha...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[finite group]], whose order is relatively prime to a prime <math>p</math>. Suppose <math>V</math> is an Abelian <math>p</math>-group, and we have an action of <math>G</math> on <math>V</math> by automorphisms. Then, if <math>W</math> is a [[direct factor]] of <math>V</math> that is invariant under the <math>G</math>-action, there exists a complement <math>W'</math> to <math>W</math> in <math>V</math>, that is also invariant under the <math>G</math>-action.
==Statement for Abelian groups===
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[finite group]], whose order is relatively prime to a prime <math>p</math>. Suppose <math>V</math> is an Abelian group, and we have an action of <math>G</math> on <math>V</math> by automorphisms. Then, if <math>W</math> is a [[direct factor]] of <math>V</math> that is invariant under the <math>G</math>-action, there exists a complement <math>W'</math> to <math>W</math> in <math>V</math> that is also invariant under the <math>G</math>-action.


In the particular case where <math>V</math> is elementary Abelian, we get the usual [[Maschke's lemma]] for prime fields.
In the particular case where <math>V</math> is elementary Abelian, we get the usual [[Maschke's lemma]] for prime fields.


==Related facts==
* [[Maschke's averaging lemma]]: Here,
==References==
==References==
===Textbook references===
===Textbook references===
* {{booklink-proved|Gorenstein}}, Page 69, Theorem 3.2
* {{booklink-proved|Gorenstein}}, Page 69, Theorem 3.2

Revision as of 22:26, 17 October 2008

Statement

Statement for Abelian groups=

Suppose G is a finite group, whose order is relatively prime to a prime p. Suppose V is an Abelian group, and we have an action of G on V by automorphisms. Then, if W is a direct factor of V that is invariant under the G-action, there exists a complement W to W in V that is also invariant under the G-action.

In the particular case where V is elementary Abelian, we get the usual Maschke's lemma for prime fields.

Related facts

References

Textbook references