Local powering-invariant subgroup containing the center is intermediately local powering-invariant in nilpotent group: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| 1 || <math>Z(G) \le K</math>. || || <math>Z(G) \le H, H \le K</math>. || || given-direct | | 1 || <math>Z(G) \le K</math>. || || <math>Z(G) \le H, H \le K</math>. || || given-direct | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2 || <math>K</math> is | | 2 || <math>K</math> is nilpotent. || Fact (3) || <math>G</math> is nilpotent, <math>K \le G</math> || || Given-fact direct | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 3 || <math> | | 3 || <math>K</math> is <math>p</math>-torsion-free. || Fact (2) || <math>h \in K</math> has a unique <math>p^{th}</math> root in <math>K</math>. || || We use the equivalence (3) implies (1) within the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2). | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 4 || | | 4 || <math>Z(G)</math> is <math>p</math>-torsion-free. || Fact (1) || || Steps (1), (3) || Step-fact combination direct | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 5 || The | | 5 || The map <math>t \mapsto t^p</math> is injective in <math>G</math>. || Fact (2) ||<math>G</math> is nilpotent || Step (4) || Step-fact combination direct (specifically, we want to use the implication from (4) to (1) in the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2)) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 6 || The element <math>x</math> of Step (5) is in <math>H</math>. || || <math>H</math> is local powering-invariant in <math>G</math>. || Step ( | | 6 || The element <math>x \in K</math>is the unique <math>p^{th}</math> root of <math>h</math> in all of <math>G</math>. || || <math>x \in K</matH> satisfies <math>x^p = h</math>. || Step (5) || given-step direct | ||
|- | |||
| 7 || The element <math>x</math> of Step (6) is in <math>H</math>. || || <math>H</math> is local powering-invariant in <math>G</math>. || Step (6) || Step-given combination direct. | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 20:43, 1 July 2013
Statement
Suppose is a nilpotent group and is a subgroup containing the center of that is also a local powering-invariant subgroup of . Then, is an intermediately local powering-invariant subgroup of . Explicitly, suppose is a subgroup of containing . Then, is a local powering-invariant subgroup of .
Related facts
Facts used
- Torsion-freeness for a prime is subgroup-closed
- Equivalence of definitions of nilpotent group that is torsion-free for a set of primes
Proof
Given: A nilpotent group , a subgroup of that is local powering-invariant and such that where is the center of . A subgroup of containing . A prime number and an element such that there is a unique element satisfying .
To prove: There exists a unique element such that .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | . | . | given-direct | ||
| 2 | is nilpotent. | Fact (3) | is nilpotent, | Given-fact direct | |
| 3 | is -torsion-free. | Fact (2) | has a unique root in . | We use the equivalence (3) implies (1) within the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2). | |
| 4 | is -torsion-free. | Fact (1) | Steps (1), (3) | Step-fact combination direct | |
| 5 | The map is injective in . | Fact (2) | is nilpotent | Step (4) | Step-fact combination direct (specifically, we want to use the implication from (4) to (1) in the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2)) |
| 6 | The element is the unique root of in all of . | satisfies . | Step (5) | given-step direct | |
| 7 | The element of Step (6) is in . | is local powering-invariant in . | Step (6) | Step-given combination direct. |